What you've done is set out to disprove mainstream. Not the other way around. Entirely different position. I know my statement is true because otherwise you would have already known the answers I provided and that your bullet points were wrong. In turn destroying FE for you.
I have nothing invested in globe or spin. Though I have written math which doesn't work if that's wrong. Where the results are within 1-2 minutes of observable reality. Whereby my math was an estimate. Accordingly, it continues to validate the status quo and debunk FE every step of the way. This is empirical evidence.
To date, I've not been able to substantiate a single FE claim. Not one.
Your rejection of our fundamental understanding of reality with absolutely no supporting evidence to do so, says a lot about you.
>This is empirical evidence.
Crazy, cause it's empirical evidence that changes ball earthers' minds.
>To date, I've not been able to substantiate a single FE claim. Not one.
I don't get that at all.
Okay.
Crazy, cause it's empirical evidence that changes ball earthers' minds.
On one hand I have observable evidence you are wrong. All evidence in fact. On the other hand I have you saying evidence doesn't matter.
No rational person will support your position. This is why I don't believe you actually believe FE.
I just don't have the time to go into it, but yes I do believe the earth is not a ball (not round) and is stationary and that the cosmos is / are geocentric and there truly is an up and a down.
> No rational person will support your position.
Talk about prima facia wrong..there are millions.
I've got to log off.
(post is archived)