His ties to ADL/JIDF and Jewish communities in the UK doesn't need to be demonstrated anymore.
I'll try to find more about that short video.
I know, but advocating for the extermination of his own race... It's a fucking stretch
Objective allies are a thing, and for robinson, demographic debasement combined to islam is the biggest threat, and you can hardly say he's completely wrong on this one
Is he aware about the jewspiracy to promote and enable mass immigration all over western societies in order to debase them to death demographically? I would say he probably heard of it, there's much more than 50% chances he did, given what ideological circles he necessarily frequented through the years. He has an internet connection, too...
Does he buy into it in part or entirely? Idk, maybe maybe not
But let's say for the sake of the argument that he does know full well and doesn't reject any of the claims made by kevin macdonald for instance, in culture of critique https://archive.is/owOeB#selection-285.0-293.23
Then his position can be viewed as the "enemy of my enemy is my ally", it's not jews bombing the shit out of everything and promoting shariah at every level, at least not directly
....
And robinson has virtually zero solid political support... Hardline antizionism combined to outright antisemitism is rather very limited in terms of political reach, to say the least. Where is patrick little now for instance? Now look at trump, the zio champ. Who scores the most in the end, who's in better position to achieve anything now?
...
I'm not saying I'm a massive fan of robinson nor that I fully endorse his strategy. Actually I believe this is ultimately somehow counter productive and will bring little to no benefit for his real or supposed cause. Should have stayed on an unapologetic anti ethnic-debasement stance, without venturing in the zog side of things, IMO
They almost always end up bought out with shekels.
Look at Sargon. How much he changed his original message since he jumped in the political train.
I believe it's a rather unavoidable fate for any public political figure aiming at going mainstream, getting significant traction
Either "you" dodge the subject entirely, or rally behind it, or confront it and face the consequences...
The better stance is to dodge it by focusing on the now, as in "ok some jews probably pushed for it, now there are some non jews, too, to say the least, who did also... Now what? I'm talking about HERE and NOW, that's what I care about" - "Israel? I'm talking about HERE and NOW" etc. Basically to keep the focus on problem fixing, not on rebuttal/revenge over past things... Avoid to fall into the "are you with us or against us" trap
Now, the better "better stance", is to not be a public figure to begin with, because you can't shoot at what you can't see
...
There's no official pro free speech/pro gun public figure/candidate for instance in the US. Quite the opposite. And yet look at the support being those concepts... The legions of faceless/random people supporting those...
(post is archived)