They almost always end up bought out with shekels.
Look at Sargon. How much he changed his original message since he jumped in the political train.
I believe it's a rather unavoidable fate for any public political figure aiming at going mainstream, getting significant traction
Either "you" dodge the subject entirely, or rally behind it, or confront it and face the consequences...
The better stance is to dodge it by focusing on the now, as in "ok some jews probably pushed for it, now there are some non jews, too, to say the least, who did also... Now what? I'm talking about HERE and NOW, that's what I care about" - "Israel? I'm talking about HERE and NOW" etc. Basically to keep the focus on problem fixing, not on rebuttal/revenge over past things... Avoid to fall into the "are you with us or against us" trap
Now, the better "better stance", is to not be a public figure to begin with, because you can't shoot at what you can't see
...
There's no official pro free speech/pro gun public figure/candidate for instance in the US. Quite the opposite. And yet look at the support being those concepts... The legions of faceless/random people supporting those...
(post is archived)