WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

756

Did you ever ask yourself this question?

Please don't answer "Hans Blix and the UN would have said it was a lie". They were already saying there were no WMDs, while the US "intelligence" agencies, the press and the politicians were saying otherwise. It would have been utterly trivial to plant a few chemical weapons, organize a photo op, bombard the public ad nauseam, bombard again by making a movie about it, and all would be good.

If you can lie about something as grotesque as 911, or sustain blatant historical exaggerations across generations, you can pull this off.

Instead, we got , starring Matt Damon. The film expounds the corruption and the faulty intelligence.

What about the 2008 financial crisis? Wasn't TARP a bit too obvious? A provocation. They could have easily monetized all those "troubled assets" through the Fed - and actually they did monetize trillions (QE). The TARP 800 billion is a joke amount for the Fed, and yet it is huge for the federal budget, and was plastered all over. The story that congressmen were threatened with martial law if they didn't vote for it was everywhere.

The different propaganda movies about the financial crisis confirm this view: evil wallstreeters, corrupt regulators, etc. All focus on the "Lehman event". None properly condemn the money system (and those responsible for it), but all abound in criticism for the financial/political establishment.

House of cards is another example. What's up with that show? Netflix seems to subscribe to the propaganda / mind control agenda with many of its series, so why tolerate this? Isn't it counter-productive to have a popular show about how much Washington DC is corrupt? If this was limited hangout, what would be the purpose of it? They already control all the cinematic productions, it's not like an independent/true movie/series has any chance anyway.

These occurrences are not glitches. And there are many more. They are part of the plan: destroy any semblance of public trust in existing institutions. In order to bring in a new order, you must utterly destroy the previous one.

Those who understand this tend to understand recent and current events much better.


There is a hermetic plan for a new world order, or a "golden age of man", that would last 1000 years, and that would see the world unite under one government, one religion, one money. This is apocalyptic/theosophist shit. But the central planners are very superstitious.

This is how they will try playing it out:

  • They crash the monetary system; debilitating deflation is soon followed by depressionary hyperinflation.

  • They concomitantly reveal to the world we have been governed by pedocidal maniacs. They throw in for shock value some footage of beloved politicians engaging in monstrous acts. They have been encouraging this practice for a long time, for the purpose of blackmail, but also to bring it all out when time would be right.

  • While this happens they ramp up their prosecution of the ongoing "clash of civilisations" with Islam, multiplying false-flag terrorist attacks, foreign aggression, domestic repression and internment camps (mostly for Muslims but also for dissenters, as always).

  • Countries that by that point are not engaged in world, regional or civil war will be few. They will have effectively destroyed nations.

  • All the while they keep promoting New Age / theosophist cultism.

  • When the time is right, and the people are exhausted by the violence, they bring in their messiah; probably an ETI of some kind (whether real or not). He would teach what they call the "".

But they will fail, for we know the truth.

Let them bring down the child killers, we'll deal with the actual central planners later.

Did you ever ask yourself this question? Please don't answer "Hans Blix and the UN would have said it was a lie". They were already saying there were no WMDs, while the US "intelligence" agencies, the press and the politicians were saying otherwise. It would have been utterly trivial to plant a few chemical weapons, organize a photo op, bombard the public ad nauseam, bombard again by making a movie about it, and all would be good. If you can lie about something as grotesque as 911, or sustain blatant historical exaggerations across generations, you can pull this off. Instead, we got [this movie](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Zone_%28film%29), starring Matt Damon. The film expounds the corruption and the faulty intelligence. What about the 2008 financial crisis? Wasn't TARP a bit too obvious? A provocation. They could have easily monetized all those "troubled assets" through the Fed - and actually they did monetize trillions (QE). The TARP 800 billion is a joke amount for the Fed, and yet it is huge for the federal budget, and was plastered all over. The story that congressmen were threatened with martial law if they didn't vote for it was everywhere. The different propaganda movies about the financial crisis confirm this view: evil wallstreeters, corrupt regulators, etc. All focus on the "Lehman event". None properly condemn the money system (and those responsible for it), but all abound in criticism for the financial/political establishment. House of cards is another example. What's up with that show? Netflix seems to subscribe to the propaganda / mind control agenda with many of its series, so why tolerate this? Isn't it counter-productive to have a popular show about how much Washington DC is corrupt? If this was limited hangout, what would be the purpose of it? They already control all the cinematic productions, it's not like an independent/true movie/series has any chance anyway. These occurrences are not glitches. And there are many more. They are part of the plan: destroy any semblance of public trust in existing institutions. In order to bring in a new order, you must utterly destroy the previous one. Those who understand this tend to understand recent and current events much better. --- There is a hermetic plan for a new world order, or a "golden age of man", that would last 1000 years, and that would see the world unite under one government, one religion, one money. This is apocalyptic/theosophist shit. But the central planners are very superstitious. This is how they will try playing it out: * They crash the monetary system; debilitating deflation is soon followed by depressionary hyperinflation. * They concomitantly reveal to the world we have been governed by pedocidal maniacs. They throw in for shock value some footage of beloved politicians engaging in monstrous acts. They have been encouraging this practice for a long time, for the purpose of blackmail, but also to bring it all out when time would be right. * While this happens they ramp up their prosecution of the ongoing "clash of civilisations" with Islam, multiplying false-flag terrorist attacks, foreign aggression, domestic repression and internment camps (mostly for Muslims but also for dissenters, as always). * Countries that by that point are not engaged in world, regional or civil war will be few. They will have effectively destroyed nations. * All the while they keep promoting New Age / theosophist cultism. * When the time is right, and the people are exhausted by the violence, they bring in their messiah; probably an ETI of some kind (whether real or not). He would teach what they call the "[universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer](http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm)". But they will fail, for we know the truth. Let them bring down the child killers, we'll deal with the actual central planners later.

(post is archived)