Historic heatwave in the 30's (which they make every effort to hide in the data) followed by elevated co2 in the 40's shows, just as it does at every other instance, that co2 rise follows temperature rise, not vice versa as the climate cultists would like us to believe.

Remember too that most of the earlier samples are from high latitudes, usually Antarctica, where the low temperature and large cold Ocean surface area act as a CO2 sink (Henry's Law). Whereas the more recent measurements are from Mauna Loa in Hawaii, which is much warmer and where warmer Ocean surface temperatures act as a CO2 source (Henry's Law again). Pre-direct measurement data is generally from ice core data, which has a host of issues on top of the cold temperatures under which that atmosphere was "trapped" (hint... it's not very trapped).

For a much more reliable CO2 proxy reconstruction, you could use plant stomata records from sediment samples of lakes. Though these records are patchy and difficult to find. When they are analyzed, it shows that atmospheric CO2 levels fluctuate significantly over time and are not correlated in a causal way to temperature (though the reverse is correlated, i.e. temperature effects CO2 levels).

We all know (here) you can not trust any data used by the government. It's all distortion and lies. Unfortunately, this is how ClownWorld works: (((they))) lie and the deplorables believe and react on that. The truth is destroyed and it doesn't matter because the lie already had its intended effect.

Omg, I’m so surprised, who would have thought?! But all climate scientists agree!! And trillions have been spent around the world on lowering carbon emissions, and pushing alternative energy sources and lowering our quality of life! Why would (((they))) do that?

I’m shocked, shocked I tell you!!!