WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

I read this. I was disappointed. The first half is about why and the second half is the re ordered quran. The first half was missing critical points as to why things had happened and why they are bad. I was not left happy. The second half while good to have, I found irrelevant. Most muslims arent smart enough to know their own history. Most pull out arguments about this sort of book is just corrupted or something else that invalidates logic. Its easier to point out how the old testament talks directly about jesus and not at all about muhamad,

[–] 0 pt

Now, give us some insights as to why someone should consider reading that book over one of the various other books from writers like Bill Warner (amazon.com) or Robert Spencer (amazon.com)?

[–] 0 pt

Now, give us some insights as to why someone should consider reading that book over one of the various other books

Because nowhere in the title it says you should only read that book. :P

[–] 0 pt

Perhaps, but a link to a video review, or text bearing page can help someone figure out whether any given book may or may not be worth their time is definitely more useful than a simple image of an ominous book cover. :\

[–] 0 pt

Spoonfeeding people is bad, mkay?

[–] -1 pt

Seems like a distraction from the JQ