No problem. The guy pronounces a lot of words wrong, but he doesn’t stutter or struggle so he does a great job.
No problem. The guy pronounces a lot of words wrong, but he doesn’t stutter or struggle so he does a great job.
Been hearing about it for years but never anything specific or in depth. I’m about 1/2 way through it and it actually seems like absolute required reading for any later based content on the JQ. How they established themselves and the patterns they proved about their culture in that 200 years in a single country without getting expelled was the deciding factor in their history it seems. They always seemed to get expelled before they get that far in other country’s but Russia just non stop tolerated and compromised for them right into the 1904 Revolution. What’s weird about the book is that even after the 3 part gulag archipelago about how 66 million were massacred, and specifically saying numerous times the entire soviet leadership was jewish, then writing the 200 year history about how they never assimilated in any way, refused to take part in any manual labour or enriching the land, did almost nothing but middle man their way into usury every chance they got, then when the locals gave them direct push back they immediately went WAY farther then the goy’s did and assasinated major leaders and politicians when none of their leaders were ever targeted. But after writing about 200 years of this, as soon as the conflict got heated back and forth from both sides Alexander Solzhenitsyn immediately splits the blame and starts contexting the conflict as both parties being equally guilty and highlights both sides mistakes equally. Not to be a light switch brain absolutist, but at no point when describing the Russians opposition to the revolutionaries does he make the case for their justified cumulative anger after 200 years with a ppl that did every single thing to make sure they never experienced a day of true equality.
I don’t think the author can have the knowledge he has and come to the conclusion that the pogroms weren’t totally justified after 200 years. Is he just a shill?
Been hearing about it for years but never anything specific or in depth. I’m about 1/2 way through it and it actually seems like absolute required reading for any later based content on the JQ. How they established themselves and the patterns they proved about their culture in that 200 years in a single country without getting expelled was the deciding factor in their history it seems. They always seemed to get expelled before they get that far in other country’s but Russia just non stop tolerated and compromised for them right into the 1904 Revolution.
What’s weird about the book is that even after the 3 part gulag archipelago about how 66 million were massacred, and specifically saying numerous times the entire soviet leadership was jewish, then writing the 200 year history about how they never assimilated in any way, refused to take part in any manual labour or enriching the land, did almost nothing but middle man their way into usury every chance they got, then when the locals gave them direct push back they immediately went WAY farther then the goy’s did and assasinated major leaders and politicians when none of their leaders were ever targeted.
But after writing about 200 years of this, as soon as the conflict got heated back and forth from both sides Alexander Solzhenitsyn immediately splits the blame and starts contexting the conflict as both parties being equally guilty and highlights both sides mistakes equally. Not to be a light switch brain absolutist, but at no point when describing the Russians opposition to the revolutionaries does he make the case for their justified cumulative anger after 200 years with a ppl that did every single thing to make sure they never experienced a day of true equality.
I don’t think the author can have the knowledge he has and come to the conclusion that the pogroms weren’t totally justified after 200 years.
Is he just a shill?
(post is archived)