Even if we take their pretense for the takedown at face value, how do they determine what could cause harm? One could make an argument that donating to an orphanage "could cause harm" because orphans are more likely to become criminals.
Of course we know they answer. They pick and choose what they deem to be harmful.
Even if we take their pretense for the takedown at face value, how do they determine what could cause harm? One could make an argument that donating to an orphanage "could cause harm" because orphans are more likely to become criminals.
Of course we know they answer. They pick and choose what they deem to be harmful.
The same way questioning the holocaust is considered a "public danger" issue in Germany. Yes, most people would be pissed and harm would be caused if they found they were lied to for the past 60 years over the holocaust
The same way questioning the holocaust is considered a "public danger" issue in Germany. Yes, most people would be pissed and harm would be caused if they found they were lied to for the past 60 years over the holocaust
(post is archived)