I found out what it's called when someone constantly badgers you for sources. It's called "sea-lioning".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning
Not exactly what the moonies are doing to you, but it's in the same ballpark I think.
Yeah, the moonies and the Qtards always try to put the burden on me to prove them wrong instead of them providing proof of their claims that aren't up to me to watch or read for myself. They post the links so they can do two things: 1. take me out of the conversation for a while in the hopes that I won't come back for more, or, 2. call me out for not watching/reading their material so I can't refute them because I don't have all the "facts" their source provided. It's an old game and I've been playing it for too many years now. I just try to short circuit the ploy now since they're trying to set me up in the first place.
Sealioning is exhausting your opponent, and making them sick of the conversation and the entire topic, as a debating tactic.
Thank you. Yeah, I just wanted to mention it because I just learned about it the other day and it is tangentially related to what is going on here.
And morbo doesn't do that as well?
Sealioning is the only debating fallacy that has a sweet comic strip as its origin. That I know of.
There was no conversation. There was no argument. I said, this video has some valid points and instead of having any sort of discussion, zero, the discussion is that my personal character is using some secret tactic to wear out the other person. Pathetic.
What 2Doglegwarrior was doing with regards to sealioning was issuing the same ten tired points all Moon Conspiracy Dipshits (MCD) continue to repeat. Any addressing of those points would be either ignored, dismissed with naked scorn, or a doubling down by simply repeating the refuted points as if they still stood.
His entire idiotic movement is one long campaign of sealioning the general populace into accepting his idiotic incorrect premises as if they were neither idiotic nor incorrect.
As if he'd pay any attention:
We went to the Moon using slide rules mainly, the computers onboard were a convenience not a necessity. Orbital mechanics does not require gigaflops, it requires human brains doing advanced calculus who know what they are doing.
The Apollo program wasn't just standing still. They made constant improvements, some of which resulted in a lighter payload. Also, they left that extra crap on the Moon when they left. And it was very expensive because it was made to weigh almost nothing.
No delay? What an idiot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLyJ9FHDO-c
The Van Allen Belt is asymmetrical, chucklefuck, they planned to and successfully managed to fly through what amounts to a thin spot in it. It's nearly nonexistent at the Poles, too.
Learn how photographic film plates work and how shutter aperture and speed are a thing, dipshit.
No idea what that "recorded over the telemetry data" is referring to. Sounds like horse shit. Doesn't prove a damned thing making that claim.
Oh look, an idiot typing "lol" when he says something irrelevant and idiotic.
Another one! Also, PM William Drees asked American Ambassador J William Middendorf II for a Moon rock because he wanted one like the ones that Aldrin and Armstrong had gifted to the King and Queen on a state visit. Drees had told people that Middendorf had given him a stone, but that stone sat in his personal mineral collection until after his death. Not exactly a great chain of custody there Sport.
Yeah it's hard to see stars when all the optical glass is polarized and/or gold-coated. But if starlight could be visible to the astronauts then even a bit of reflected Sunlight might be enough to cause permanent eye damage. Most of the light that otherwise would have been visible to the astronauts was filtered out in order to not burn their retinas.
2Doglewarrior is indeed the king of dipshits. All hail the king! And you appear to be angling for a job as his White Knight.
(post is archived)