You aren't interesting in having a discussion, you already made up your mind. How does a sun 93 million miles away shine brighter where the astronauts happen to be standing, no answer. How does a sun 93 million miles away cast shadows of different lengths and directions, no answer. And the idea that nobody, China, Japan, Germany, Russia, literally no one has any desire or means to go back because it's expensive is fucking Ludacris. It should cost a fraction of the price. Elon Musk would have daily shuttles to the moon if traveling to the moon was possible. It simply isn't. So you can keep attacking my character and coming up with silly terms to label me, doesn't change the fact that travelling to the moon is fake and gay because it's never happened.
How does a sun 93 million miles away shine brighter where the astronauts happen to be standing, no answer.
On Earth, we experience the Sun's radiation through an atmosphere many miles thick, with an ozone layer that specifically blocks UV spectra. In Earth's orbit, or on Earth's moon, direct Sunlight is strong enough to heat an object to the same temperature your oven is set to cook a turkey. And a lot of that is unfiltered high frequency EM radiation, such as UV and microwaves and even more energetic particles, most of which we're protected from down here by the ozone layer, the magnetosphere, and the light-scattering properties of hundreds of miles of atmosphere.
Is it possible that you're too stupid to realize that you're being stupid? "Dunning-Kruger Effect," go look that term up. That's you.
Are you saying the moon also has an atmosphere that makes only the spots where astronauts stand brighter than surrounding areas? You aren't being very clear.
That's OK, you seem too stupid to grasp the fact that the lack of much of any atmosphere at all is what makes Sunlight so powerful to someone standing on the Moon.
And the idea that nobody, China, Japan, Germany, Russia, literally no one has any desire or means to go back because it's expensive is fucking Ludacris.
I know you think you're the genius in the room, but Shirley you know that the word you were looking for is "ludicrous."
Darn, if only I hadn't had a typo my argument might have been valid.
Darn, if only I hadn't penned an entire long post addressing your moronic sealioning points, oh wait, I did.
Damn, if only you didn't argue from dishonesty, like a typical kike.
(post is archived)