You conveniently didn't answer/sidestepped my question, like a jew would. You equated Oswald Mosley as being as vile as Jack the ripper. You could have used any other vile piece of garbage in British history as an example to go with "Jack the ripper", but you chose to pair him with Oswald Mosley for your examples.
No, you are completely missing the point. If I had put my description in quotation marks it would have been more obvious. But I guess I need to explain it to you.
I chose Oswald Mosley and Jack the ripper because they are names that normies and kikes despise. Not because I despise them. The descriptive words are the mainstream opinion.
Do you get it?
Here's an example:
If I equated a nigger or sheep to Hitler he'd get mad, but if I equated you to Hitler we most likely wouldn't mind.
Oh, yes, your responses have been very informative. I understand very well now and "get it".
(post is archived)