. . SFFA didn’t agree with the justices’ logic and argued there is “no justification for using race-based admissions” and, since the practice is now illegal at non-military universities, West Point “is not exempt from the Constitution.”
SFFA contends that West Point is violating the Fifth Amendment with its skewed admission practices. The Fifth Amendment contains an equal-protection principle that binds the federal government.
“Instead of admitting future cadets based on objective metrics and leadership potential, West Point focuses on race,” the lawsuit claimed. “In fact, it openly publishes its racial composition ‘goals,’ and its director of admissions brags that race is wholly determinative for hundreds if not thousands of applicants.” . . .
I'm sure the Russians and the Chinese are terrified to learn that the US military is giving priority to recruiting niggers and spics...
Army has been blacked
Anyway, says "brags" but doesn't say what was said...
I like these policies, and see them as the only means to kicking blacks out.
Once the pendulum turns, having these as precedent allows us a legal means to prioritize the owners of our homeland, and kick out anyone else.
When the precedent is found unconstitutional, it ends. Can'be reversed and used on others. Entrance criteria should limit acceptance to the best of the best.
(post is archived)