WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

Fucking jews.

Archive: https://archive.today/aKWIa

From the post:

>Up until now, yt-dlp has been able to use its built-in JavaScript "interpreter" to solve the JavaScript challenges that are required for YouTube downloads. But due to recent changes on YouTube's end, the built-in JS interpreter will soon be insufficient for this purpose. The changes are so drastic that yt-dlp will need to leverage a proper JavaScript runtime in order to solve the JS challenges.

Fucking jews. Archive: https://archive.today/aKWIa From the post: >>Up until now, yt-dlp has been able to use its built-in JavaScript "interpreter" to solve the JavaScript challenges that are required for YouTube downloads. But due to recent changes on YouTube's end, the built-in JS interpreter will soon be insufficient for this purpose. The changes are so drastic that yt-dlp will need to leverage a proper JavaScript runtime in order to solve the JS challenges.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

No nerves hit, bruh. I love shitposting on people who take random swings and just stir up dust, like:

>get back to making your spy apps fo da gubmint n sheeeit

You sound like a nigger, always assuming the worst about people who disagree with you. I don't even hate gopher as I grew up on text-only services like BBSes, I just find it strange that someone would forgo modern tech (not even really modern, html got image support in either 95 or 96) and assume it automatically has nefarious purposes. Trust me, the jpegs and pngs on this site aren't trying to steal your credit card number.

[–] 0 pt

Not the worst about people, but yes about the tech that can be used for nefarious purposes.

Case in point: webp &webm

But I do like a good argument. I still don’t agree we need all the client side functionality. But then again, me loves me some rss.

[–] 0 pt

What's going on with webp and webm? Is it something like the mov format where you can embed a url that the player pings in the background without your knowledge?

[–] 1 pt

You should maybe look up the ability to do deep tracking and the security risks with it. It’s a cancer.