I80 is rugged as fuck for a lot of it's expanse. I get what the article is trying to say, and it is right in terms of the state has a lot of under utilized space. But the state is rugged as fuck as a whole. So even if they could get some wind mills and batteries up, finding good land for a footprint is kinda difficult outside of the big cities
Yeah, the primary problem makes sense though. Its the power grid. There just are not a lot of parts of the state that has major transmission lines to hook into.
It would be nice to use the power IN Wyoming rather than selling it to Commiefornia like a lot of the power generated in WY. Also, pajeet hate's cold and wind... Great place to build infrastructure where pajeet won't want to work no matter what they are paid.
I remember reading that SMRs were being considered for large parts of both Utah and Wyoming specifically for the reason of trying to connect more of the state to SOME kind of grid. Even a 300mw reactor would be good for the rural parts where no one really needs a lot of power.
I agree with you completely though. It's not just power, but water that the fucking leech state robs from everyone else. It's almost as if building miles of tract housing in the middle of literal fucking deserts like palm desert or Temecula was a horrible fucking idea.
Well, realistically anyone that needs power in Wyoming has it. The vast majority of the land is government owned and cant/wont be developed and there are little to no places where you have a house in Wyoming that can't get some sort of grid power.
Wyoming is being used as a test-case for SMR mainly because they can build them out where there is basically zero population and most of the people in the state don't really care. If you tried to build it in NYC you would have protesters shutting down the city because "nuclear bad, I don't know why but nuclear bad".
I do agree about the stupidity of some city's existing. Vegas is a great example of "what the fuck"?
(post is archived)