Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

965

Apologies for the direct link. I can't get archives to work.

In a referendum with major implications for Switzerland’s sovereignty and relationship with the European Union, Swiss voters on Sunday rejected a proposal to cap their country’s population at 10 million by restricting immigration. Despite the proposal’s defeat, however, the relatively narrow vote margin demonstrates growing public opposition to mass migration.

The proposal, titled “No 10-million Switzerland,” was rejected with 54.79 percent of the popular vote. As a constitutional amendment, it also needed a majority of cantons (the Swiss equivalent to states in the United States) voting in favor. Only 10 cantons (including half-cantons) supported it, while 13 voted against it. Nearly 59 percent of voters turned out, an unusually high proportion for nationwide referendums.

Apologies for the direct link. I can't get archives to work. > In a referendum with major implications for Switzerland’s sovereignty and relationship with the European Union, Swiss voters on Sunday rejected a proposal to cap their country’s population at 10 million by restricting immigration. Despite the proposal’s defeat, however, the relatively narrow vote margin demonstrates growing public opposition to mass migration. > The proposal, titled “No 10-million Switzerland,” was rejected with 54.79 percent of the popular vote. As a constitutional amendment, it also needed a majority of cantons (the Swiss equivalent to states in the United States) voting in favor. Only 10 cantons (including half-cantons) supported it, while 13 voted against it. Nearly 59 percent of voters turned out, an unusually high proportion for nationwide referendums.
[–] • 2 pts (edited )

Not "narrowly".

Rather, (((narrowly))).

This is why:

Specifically, the measure stipulated that if the country’s population surpassed 9.5 million, the government would have had to restrict asylum and family reunification and renegotiate international agreements that promote mass migration. If the population exceeded 10 million, Switzerland would have been required to withdraw from the UN’s Global Compact for Migration and its agreement with the European Union allowing for the free movement of people.

This would require Schweiz to remove itself from the kike-headed Euro-cabal of brown vermin lovers.

jews hate this, so they had to ensure it lost (((narrowly))).