The Kremlin is now faced with a much enlarged frontier with NATO from the prospect of Finland, with its long border with Russia and nearness to St. Petersburg, joining NATO. Finland is under no danger of Russian attack as matters stand, but will be if Finland joins NATO. Joining NATO means Finland will be nuclear-targeted, which currently the country is not. It is obvious that Finland’s security deteriorates if Finland joins NATO.
So why join?
The most obvious answer is that Washington has paid the Finish leaders to add to the pressure on the Kremlin by joining NATO. I have good reason to believe this. Years ago I was in the Pentagon in the office of a very high official being offered an important appointment. I used the opportunity to ask a question about something that had long puzzled me. How, I asked, does Washington manage to get foreign governments to support Washington’s interests at the expense of their own countries? “Money,” the high Pentagon official said. “You mean foreign aid,” I said. “No,” the official said, “we give the political leaders bags full of money. We own them. They report to us.”
>The Kremlin is now faced with a much enlarged frontier with NATO from the prospect of Finland, with its long border with Russia and nearness to St. Petersburg, joining NATO. Finland is under no danger of Russian attack as matters stand, but will be if Finland joins NATO. Joining NATO means Finland will be nuclear-targeted, which currently the country is not. It is obvious that Finland’s security deteriorates if Finland joins NATO.
>So why join?
>The most obvious answer is that Washington has paid the Finish leaders to add to the pressure on the Kremlin by joining NATO. I have good reason to believe this. Years ago I was in the Pentagon in the office of a very high official being offered an important appointment. I used the opportunity to ask a question about something that had long puzzled me. How, I asked, does Washington manage to get foreign governments to support Washington’s interests at the expense of their own countries? “Money,” the high Pentagon official said. “You mean foreign aid,” I said. “No,” the official said, “we give the political leaders bags full of money. We own them. They report to us.”
A bigger game indeed.
How about the destruction of the Western fiat central banking cartels and their NWO agenda?
How about Russia decides to go into the insurance business and remove's Lloyds of London's global insurance monopoly?
How about the collapse of the E.U.?
How about the collapse of NATO?
How about the collapse of the U.N. and it's institutions?
There are many dimensions at play here.
Most assume that NATO will be victorious on the battlefield vrs the Russians.
How is that working out so far?
Getting the Soviet Union to collapse was one thing, but they were communists who couldn't feed themselves. The Soviets were propped up by the West during their entire existence. Russia is capitalist now, turning a healthy annual profit, and it is us who have embraced communism with debts that cannot be repaid. The EU already begs Russia for energy and food, and will probably collapse without it. Actual famine in Europe... it's been a long time since that last happened.
The Russians are playing this game from a position of strength, not weakness.
What the West really did, by cutting all ties with Russia, is they have lost all legal and financial hold over Russia. Russia no longer has to respect Western patents, and can openly just steal all of our tech. Fuck all we can do about that. That's just the beginning.
A bigger game indeed.
How about the destruction of the Western fiat central banking cartels and their NWO agenda?
How about Russia decides to go into the insurance business and remove's Lloyds of London's global insurance monopoly?
How about the collapse of the E.U.?
How about the collapse of NATO?
How about the collapse of the U.N. and it's institutions?
There are many dimensions at play here.
Most assume that NATO will be victorious on the battlefield vrs the Russians.
How is that working out so far?
Getting the Soviet Union to collapse was one thing, but they were communists who couldn't feed themselves. The Soviets were propped up by the West during their entire existence. Russia is capitalist now, turning a healthy annual profit, and it is us who have embraced communism with debts that cannot be repaid. The EU already begs Russia for energy and food, and will probably collapse without it. Actual famine in Europe... it's been a long time since that last happened.
The Russians are playing this game from a position of strength, not weakness.
What the West really did, by cutting all ties with Russia, is they have lost all legal and financial hold over Russia. Russia no longer has to respect Western patents, and can openly just steal all of our tech. Fuck all we can do about that. That's just the beginning.
Can someone give me a rundown of Finland, its culture, the psychology of its people, what their concerns are, or links thereof?
With a better understanding of them, we can tailor messages and strategies to them that may dissuade them from taking this dangerous course, or will help third parties to persuade Finland away from war. The Finns are a great people, and I do not wish to see innocent people there suffer and die because of their compromised government and propaganda.
Can someone give me a rundown of Finland, its culture, the psychology of its people, what their concerns are, or links thereof?
With a better understanding of them, we can tailor messages and strategies to them that may dissuade them from taking this dangerous course, or will help third parties to persuade Finland away from war. The Finns are a great people, and I do not wish to see innocent people there suffer and die because of their compromised government and propaganda.
(post is archived)