Came to question the legality of it too, because confiscation of assets based on nationality is highly likely illegal.. i really do not like the 'highly likely" -part, but the problem is that those wanting to impose sanctions and so on, doesn't give two fucks about concepts like "law", "ethics" and "basic human rights"..
They'll claim ties to Putin and even the flimsiest proof will be sufficient.
Lawfaggotry, never the less:
Came to question the legality of it too, because confiscation of assets based on nationality is highly likely illegal.. i really do not like the 'highly likely" -part, but the problem is that those wanting to impose sanctions and so on, doesn't give two fucks about concepts like "law", "ethics" and "basic human rights"..
They'll claim ties to Putin and even the flimsiest proof will be sufficient.
Lawfaggotry, never the less:
https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-challenging-and-enforcing-arbitration-awards/2nd-edition/article/prevention-of-asset-stripping-worldwide-freezing-orders
(post is archived)