When it comes to making bets on the future of your nation, "in general" is what matters.
Giving a female power and hoping they aren't going to act like a female is a seriously asinine thought process.
Exceptional women exist, to be sure, but forgetting that 95% of them follow a distinct behavioral pattern is societal suicide.
Again, I state, (premise: 95% of women are shit ... agreed) do you trust more than 5% of males? I sure as fuck don't.
Both men and women are shit as leaders. That's what stupid misoganists (whatever) on this site and Voat never understood.
E: And I want to make it clear: 0.000001% of women are good leaders; 0.0005% of men are good leaders. It is obvious women suck at leading, but the vast majority of men suck at leading as well.
I had to make a separate post for this because ... well, just because.
I'd follow Joan of Arc anywhere. What male would you ever follow completely? Hitler? Agreed. Anyone else? So we are tied, one to one.
E: Unless you have some others in mind. But I know for a fact, there is not many.
You do know that about 95% of men suck dick as leaders too, right? If not 99.99999%.
E: There was this one guy. Meh, he was back in the 1920/30s. Nevermind.
(post is archived)