WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

501

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts (edited )

Think of it as a way to avoid karmic debt. Example; person 1"hey cock bag I'm going to rob you"

Person 2 "oh god don't rob Me please here just take whatever you want don't hurt me"

See in this example, person. 2 was told what was going to happen, and instead of saying no, or fighting back. Person 2 gave person 1 what they wanted. They were never really robbed then. Just coerced. In (((their))) religion, if they tell you the truth, even if it's indirectly in a movie, or done in a secret coded message you don't understand. They told you and gave you the opportunity to say no. When Russel brand is telling you what they are doing and we go "ha knew it" and still do nothing. They avoid most of the karmic debt. He is, in a sense controlled "opposition"

[–] 3 pts

Doesn't matter if people are or not. If someone says something that is true, even if he's a vegan, pro nhs, climate faggot, you can't disagree because of other choices they make.

"some of my best friends are niggers".

[–] 1 pt

None of my friends are niggers.

Beaver typing “You can’t”, has as much weight as me saying “Beaver has to wear a dildo stuck to his forehead like a unicorn in public”.

If russel is controlled opposition then following his lead influences the conclusion that his followers come to. Sort of like what you’re trying to do now. Russel is in the Rumble home page suggested videos every day. This tells me he is mainstream acceptable narrative used to keep ‘awake’ boomers/genx on course.

[–] 0 pt

Idols are for useless faggots. I agree with you that he is most probably a pied piper and they want people to follow "the crazy man" so they can use him as a scapegoat later.

But at the moment he's mixing truths with lies, and I am functionably able to tell the difference.

I will repeat what I just said. I can still say a statement from someone is true, even if, as a whole, I want that person thrown from a helicopter.

[–] 1 pt

I know somone who likes this guy, I can't tolerate him for more than a minute.

[–] 1 pt

Brand has some independent ideas but his show business fame and fortune are wholly controlled by (((one group))) that will ultimately define his limits to truth.

[–] 0 pt

Seems like he's starting to question his team. Wouldn't trust him, but he's shift the conversation to places (((they))) didn't want it to go.

could just be an outlet, but whatever gets the needle moving.

He knows where the clickbait money is and following in Bill the jew Maher's footsteps.