Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.2K

The Oligarchy has everybody (((leveraged)))to the point where they must comply. I’m only in debt to MYSELF. I still have to pay back $3500 of debt to my bank account for a $15K watch purchase. Not letting these jobs bully me into poisoning myself for some evil masterplan. Sent the email last week citing my religious convictions. So, I guess there will be a delay in recouping that $3500. More people should have put their foot down. Instead, they risked death, dishonor and probably getting the mark of the beast to appease some employer. Life is bigger than some job.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/yGybQMriJkdt/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/xgUdj7syoaQ4/

The Oligarchy has everybody (((leveraged)))to the point where they must comply. I’m only in debt to MYSELF. I still have to pay back $3500 of debt to my bank account for a $15K watch purchase. Not letting these jobs bully me into poisoning myself for some evil masterplan. Sent the email last week citing my religious convictions. So, I guess there will be a delay in recouping that $3500. More people should have put their foot down. Instead, they risked death, dishonor and probably getting the mark of the beast to appease some employer. Life is bigger than some job. https://www.bitchute.com/video/yGybQMriJkdt/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/xgUdj7syoaQ4/

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (120).
[–] • 0 pt

I do this stuff for a living: what I said is correct.

Sue them for violating the American Civil Rights Act.

It comes with monetary loss and reputational damage. It will hurt their stocks when negative news comes out. This is the thing you talk about.

Money is where it hurts them. It doesn't matter if the money is tied up in securities: it's money.

[–] • -1 pt

  1. Do you know what I do for a living? Whatever the fuck I want. I don't give a shit what your "position" is and you won't vex me in to some authoritative frame. All of you lawfags are so annoying to talk to.

  2. I'm challenging that "hurting them in their wallets" is a hilarious assertion seeing as how money is just magic fakery where they write down or speak whatever number something is, but they can have/take whatever they want because "money" isn't at all what you think it is.

  3. I never said you were wrong.

[–] • 0 pt

Do you know what I do for a living? Whatever the fuck I want. I don't give a shit what your "position" is and you won't vex me in to some authoritative frame. All of you lawfags are so annoying to talk to.

Don't get mad because you know I'm right and use factor analysis information risk management as well as other quantitative risk management techniques as part of the job I do. I literally have to deal with situations where monetary loss and reputational damage for disobeying the law is taken into consideration when executing policies. You said some stupid shit and tried to disagree with me and were wrong. Act like an adult and say, "Oh, yeah, stocks full under the 'money' metaphor. Good point."

Instead, your fragile ego flies off the handle in this retarded cringe tantrum. Don't you feel a little ashamed at how stupid and immature you seem? Reread what I said and then your 3 point reply. Don't you feel even a little bit ashamed? Maybe a bit pathetic? Don't you cringe at your own reply? Or are you too narcissistic to see how utterly stupid and cringe you seem like?

I'm challenging that "hurting them in their wallets" is a hilarious assertion seeing as how money is just magic fakery where they write down or speak whatever number something is, but they can have/take whatever they want because "money" isn't at all what you think it is.

Magic fakery or not, this is how the system works and if you're too stupid to understand how it works, shut up and let the smart people do the talking and listen to what we tell you. You're too stupid and uneducated to know any better so it's better if people like you keep your mouth shut.

I never said you were wrong.

Incorrect. You asserted that the elites different assets than "money" and that money is for cattle. I disagreed and explained how money is a catch-all for many different things. And here we are.

Now bitch more with emotional outrage and lengthy replies to cope more. Or call me a "kike/nigger/faggot/jew/glowie/fed" instead of coming up with a reply like the rest of you retards do anytime I hand your ass to you.

[–] • 0 pt

my job description takes more words to describe than yours

That's really interesting, mister, but I don't care about your wordnigger job. Then you just use repetition stamping to pinpoint an emotion the reader is supposed to feel like these aren't juvenile techniques. The sad part is, plenty of the mouthbreathers here would probably gobble this kind of shit up. What's worse is you then have the gall to pretend I'm the one making a fool of themselves when you're the one on some boastful stampede.

Magic fakery or not, this is how the system works and if you're too stupid to understand how it works, shut up and let the smart people do the talking and listen to what we tell you. You're too stupid and uneducated to know any better so it's better if people like you keep your mouth shut.

Oh boy are your feelings hurt? Those are some interesting ways of pre-begging. You may as well just beg me to stop saying it.

Incorrect. You asserted that the elites different assets than "money" and that money is for cattle. I disagreed and explained how money is a catch-all for many different things. And here we are.

I knew the second you thought I was disagreeing that you'd say something stupid like this. I'm explaining to you their perspectives, echoing what they say. I'm doing this for a good reason. If you really want, I can explain more: "Money" isn't something they care about. They use leverage, often via intelligence, to blackmail or threaten people. They don't need money. Instead, they help direct resources in to favors or cash to offer those they manipulate. This is what I was explaining. My issue isn't anything you suggested, but I was leading in to "hurting the wallets" hurts the wrong people, it was what influences your suggestion, as you explained. I understand you probably thought I was being smug when I said you weren't getting it, but I was just explaining the first point: that money being used to get people to do things is a central point to this. I was saying you were suggesting the right thing for the wrong reason. So, again, I didn't disagree with you.