Crusades when [665x319] | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (32).

[–] • 1 pt

I say this often, but "Gun Free Zone" signs don't read the same to lunatics. This troon reads that sign, and sees "Helpless victims inside!".

Signs should be posted that say "50% of staff are trained and carrying concealed arms." I don't think this would deter many lunatics... although, this particular troon did have two targets in mind, and chose this place because she believed the other potential target had too much security. But if we can get rid of the perception that "schools are soft targets", maybe this shit wouldn't happen so frequently? And when it did, the teachers in the school could end it far before anyone even makes a 911 call!

This is the simplest solution to this bullshit. Arm willing teachers. Train them. Have them carry concealed- no students need to know which teachers are carrying and which aren't.

So when a psycho shoots their way into a school, kills a few people, rounds the corner and sees 63-year-old Mrs. Eldredge, a sweet old lady in a flowery dress, the last thing they'll expect is her pulling a 9mm out and putting a bullet in their rotten belly.

I always like to cite that church shooting from a while back, where that freak carried a shotgun in concealed, drew it and shot one person by surprising them... and then one of the guys in the congregation (retired or off-duty cop IIRC) pulls out his .357 and blew the freak's head off. Over in less than 3 seconds, all because ONE guy with a gun and the skill to use it was there.

That's the thing about mass shooters- they're not looking to fight, they're looking to slaughter, hence the choice of "soft targets". They know they will probably lose a gunfight against a trained person, even if they have a rifle and the trained person has a pistol. These incidents almost always end the same way- as soon as they encounter resistance, they either get shot dead, shoot themselves, or surrender; their "game" is over as soon as someone capable of taking their control away engages them. The fun is over, whatever rush they were feeling ends- they're not in charge suddenly. I think that really bothers the type of people who do shit like this.

I say this often, but "Gun Free Zone" signs don't read the same to lunatics. This troon reads that sign, and sees "Helpless victims inside!". Signs should be posted that say "50% of staff are trained and carrying concealed arms." I don't think this would deter many lunatics... although, this particular troon did have two targets in mind, and chose this place because she believed the other potential target had too much security. But if we can get rid of the perception that "schools are soft targets", maybe this shit wouldn't happen so frequently? And when it did, the teachers in the school could end it far before anyone even makes a 911 call! This is the simplest solution to this bullshit. Arm willing teachers. Train them. Have them carry concealed- no students need to know which teachers are carrying and which aren't. So when a psycho shoots their way into a school, kills a few people, rounds the corner and sees 63-year-old Mrs. Eldredge, a sweet old lady in a flowery dress, the last thing they'll expect is her pulling a 9mm out and putting a bullet in their rotten belly. I always like to cite that church shooting from a while back, where that freak carried a shotgun in concealed, drew it and shot one person by surprising them... and then one of the guys in the congregation (retired or off-duty cop IIRC) pulls out his .357 and blew the freak's head off. Over in less than 3 seconds, all because ONE guy with a gun and the skill to use it was there. That's the thing about mass shooters- they're not looking to fight, they're looking to slaughter, hence the choice of "soft targets". They know they will probably lose a gunfight against a trained person, even if they have a rifle and the trained person has a pistol. These incidents almost always end the same way- as soon as they encounter resistance, they either get shot dead, shoot themselves, or surrender; their "game" is over as soon as someone capable of taking their control away engages them. The fun is over, whatever rush they were feeling ends- they're not in charge suddenly. I think that *really* bothers the type of people who do shit like this.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

This is the simplest solution to this bullshit. Arm willing teachers. Train them. Have them carry concealed- no students need to know which teachers are carrying and which aren't.

I think the only reason we don't get that nationwide is because of nigger areas and classrooms. Granted they could just be left unarmed (lol) if they wanted to do that themselves, but I think our (((politicians))) don't want to touch it because it would look bad either way and they're retarded fucking spineless ziocucks.

I'm sure the (((media))) lobbies against fixing it too because they would lose the lever to push normies into wanting more gun control.

As I often say kicking the jews and non-Whites out (because it's not just niggers doing crime, though it's "mostly" just niggers and spics) would solve most problems overnight.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

You're probably aware of this, but up until around the '60s, almost all schools nationwide had rifle class for elementary school aged kids. They had fucking arsenals in the schools, dozens of rifles and loads of ammunition. The teachers, including the females, knew how they operated and how to be safe with them. They'd teach the kids how they worked, and eventually let them shoot them.

School shootings didn't become a problem till what, the late 80s? Long after all of the guns were removed from the schools. This demonstrates a simple fact: The mere presence of firearms does not cause shootings. And that's what the pearl-clutchers are always on about, that teachers shouldn't have guns because there should be no guns in the school.

I hate this naive notion that you can just make more laws, and that will cause criminals to stop being criminals, or stop loonies from being loonies. The only people that gun laws affect are people who follow the fucking law, the type of people who wouldn't just murder someone.

Brazil is a fantastic example of what happens when gun ownership is made illegal- it leads to a situation where only cops and criminals have guns, and civilians have to obtain guns and carry them "illegally", or else they're 100% at the mercy of vicious killers. Most of South America is like this.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

School shootings didn't become a problem till what, the late 80s?

I'm not sure about what shootings there were in the 80s at all, but I know it basically started happening after the "Gun Free School Zone Act".

It would be hilarious if they reintroduced the rifle clubs and did it at nigger schools expecting it to work though. Planet of the Apes within 5 minutes.

parent
link