I would disagree…
Maybe it’s pedantic, but I would consider “technology” to be a deeper understanding of and manipulation of or control of those led.
Traditionally, that happens in the lector is world, a deeper understanding of the flow of electrons… Movement of bits and bytes, ones and zeros. It has led to massive advances in the computer realm.
At the same time, though, construction science is a thing. The ability to utilize materials, leverage angles, attach methodologies… I’m out of my element there, so don’t really know the nuances of it, but I do get that construction science is a thing. With that, I would say that it is a technology…
I would disagree…
You said you disagree with me but then went on to agree with me. huh???
Shit…it’s late. I was looking more at the bakers portion of your comment, and addressing that.
(post is archived)