WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

584

So I was just researching this math concept I stumbled upon called ex nihilo nihil fit or "nothing comes from nothing". It was youtube video about how matter can not come into being from nothing. I'm not sure where I stand on that. I could see people using it as an argument FOR and AGAINST the existence of a God for example. It certainly makes one wonder about where the Earth, mountains, animals and such came from. Maybe some of you are more familiar with those perspectives.

But anyway halfway into reading this writing by the Roman poet and philosopher Lucretius I started feeling like I was reading an argument against miscegenation but in a neutral, objective and non-offensive way honestly. Like this is the kind of thing I feel like anyone could agree with not just so called "white identity" proponents. For example he likens the whole discussion of Breed and Species to a tree that can either produce apples or pears but to expect it to produce both is silly and there is a value in their separateness. The final line for example "There is a separate power to distinct things."

What do yall think?.... am I way off on this?

But by observing Nature and her laws. And this will lay The warp out for us—her first principle: that nothing's brought Forth by any supernatural power out of naught. For certainly all men are in the clutches of a dread— Beholding many things take place in heaven overhead Or here on earth whose causes they can't fathom, they assign The explanation for these happenings to powers divine. Nothing can be made from nothing—once we see that's so, Already we are on the way to what we want to know. For if things were created out of nothing, any breed Could be born from any other; nothing would require a seed. People could pop out of the sea, the scaly tribes arise Out of the earth, and winged birds could hatch right from the skies. Born willy-nilly, every animal, both wild and tame, Would inhabit cultivated land and wilderness the same. The same tree would not always grow the same fruit—what might bear An apple one time, might, the next, produce a quince or pear. Since there would be no generating particles, then neither Would certain things arise from only a certain kind of mother. But since in fact each species rises from specific seeds, Each thing springs from the source that has the matter that it needs, The primary particles, and comes into the boundaries Of light, and that's the reason every thing cannot give rise To every other thing, because there is a separate power In distinct things.

So I was just researching this math concept I stumbled upon called ex nihilo nihil fit or "nothing comes from nothing". It was youtube video about how matter can not come into being from nothing. I'm not sure where I stand on that. I could see people using it as an argument FOR and AGAINST the existence of a God for example. It certainly makes one wonder about where the Earth, mountains, animals and such came from. Maybe some of you are more familiar with those perspectives. But anyway halfway into reading this writing by the Roman poet and philosopher Lucretius I started feeling like I was reading an argument against miscegenation but in a neutral, objective and non-offensive way honestly. Like this is the kind of thing I feel like anyone could agree with not just so called "white identity" proponents. For example he likens the whole discussion of Breed and Species to a tree that can either produce apples or pears but to expect it to produce both is silly and there is a value in their separateness. The final line for example "There is a separate power to distinct things." What do yall think?.... am I way off on this? But by observing Nature and her laws. And this will lay The warp out for us—her first principle: that nothing's brought Forth by any supernatural power out of naught. For certainly all men are in the clutches of a dread— Beholding many things take place in heaven overhead Or here on earth whose causes they can't fathom, they assign The explanation for these happenings to powers divine. Nothing can be made from nothing—once we see that's so, Already we are on the way to what we want to know. For if things were created out of nothing, any breed Could be born from any other; nothing would require a seed. People could pop out of the sea, the scaly tribes arise Out of the earth, and winged birds could hatch right from the skies. Born willy-nilly, every animal, both wild and tame, Would inhabit cultivated land and wilderness the same. The same tree would not always grow the same fruit—what might bear An apple one time, might, the next, produce a quince or pear. Since there would be no generating particles, then neither Would certain things arise from only a certain kind of mother. But since in fact each species rises from specific seeds, Each thing springs from the source that has the matter that it needs, The primary particles, and comes into the boundaries Of light, and that's the reason every thing cannot give rise To every other thing, because there is a separate power In distinct things.

(post is archived)