Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

I don't remember who originally posted this on Voat:

This is the "UfA Tonwoche" newsreel, issue 468, aired on 23 August, 1939. One week later, Germany launched the Poland offensive.

Subtitled by yours truly, just for you goats.

Short version: https://vid8.poal.co/user/RomanSalute/wTtBlMM?autoplay=off Full version: https://vid8.poal.co/user/RomanSalute/jpfBPWn?autoplay=off

The short version is just the good stuff. The full version is the entire newsreel and has a few minutes of random segments before the good stuff. A curious glimpse of history. The WEBM versions have the subtitles baked in and are a bit more compressed. The MKV versions have embedded soft subtitles, so they can be turned on and off, and the video and audio didn't need to be re-encoded and are the best quality I could find. You'll probably need to download the mkv version to view it.

To my knowledge this has never been available in English to the general public. Not before the war, not during, and not after. Not until now.

Why did Germany invade Poland?

A question that often comes up when discussing WW2. Even here, people rarely know or have good answers. Even more rare than answers are sources. As with any war, the victors put a lot of effort into burying and discrediting any just cause their enemy might have had.

This video lays out the German perspective, the situation they were in, the history that led up to it, and why they had to act.

It explains how the territories in question, that Germany "invaded", were still Germany merely 20 years prior, before the Treaty of Versailles of 1919, and had been German for hundreds of years before that. It shows that Germans still lived on that land, and spoke German, and wanted to be German, and part of Germany. They had no interest in being Polish. They were just told one day that they must be. It shows German refugees fleeing those regions, their own homeland, that their ancestors had lived on for hundreds of years, because of the hunger and poverty and violence they suffered under Polish rule. Many of them testify that they are forbidden from teaching their children German, their own language, or sending them to German schools. Those who disobey are imprisoned or sent to Russia.

Is it all just Nazi propaganda and lies? Maybe. My job is to show it to you. Yours is to decide what's true.

But ask yourself: Why has nobody shown this to you before? Why would sharing this in Germany likely land you a cell next to Mrs Haverbeck?

PS: No hard feelings for any Poles or Brits here. If you're reading this, you probably weren't around back then. And, bear in mind, they didn't have internet or places like Voat back then. If you never saw this until today, imagine how hopelessly clamped down and controlled the information available to the average Pole or Brit was back then. They had no chance to see the other side of things. That's how they were able to pit us against each other. Let's not let that happen again.

PPS: I don't plan to share this anywhere else, except maybe Poal, as a housewarming gift. But that's largely the same crowd anyway. So, if you want more people to know about this, then that is up to you. It is not enough to merely believe. If you want to change the world, then you must be willing to act.

For a contemporary analogy, consider this alternate timeline:

In 1999, towards the end of his term, Bill Clinton hands over Texas and Oklahoma to Mexico "for diversity" or whatever
Overnight, Americans living in Texas and Oklahoma are told they now live in and are subjects of Mexico
Their citizenship is annulled, they are now Mexicans instead and cannot leave or visit family without a visa
Obviously, actual Mexicans immediately flood in and take over the region, declaring it is now theirs
They behave towards the (former) Americans as you can well imagine
Over the next two decades conditions for Americans in that region worsen drastically
Food shortages and violence become more and more common
They are forbidden from teaching their children English
They must only speak Spanish, or else the parents get thrown in jail or worse
By 2018, former Americans begin fleeing into Kansas and Louisiana as refugees
They are sick and miserable, many of them look half-starved
They tell horror stories of abuse, watching loved ones being murdered, torn to pieces, fed to dogs by cartels
Trump attempts to negotiate with Mexico, but they are standoffish
Trudeau in Canada encourages all this, telling Mexico he's got their back (he doesn't)
In 2019, all diplomacy having been rejected, Trump orders US troops to march into Texas and Oklahoma to protect Americans there
The Media calls this "Trump invades Mexico" and condemns it
Canada declares war but doesn't help Mexico. Eventually gets South American countries and China to join in
Israel profits

How would you feel about all this? How would you feel if you were stuck in Texas or OklahomaMexico? How would you feel if members of your family were stuck there, and you on the other side?

I don't remember who originally posted this on Voat: This is the "UfA Tonwoche" newsreel, issue 468, aired on 23 August, 1939. One week later, Germany launched the Poland offensive. Subtitled by yours truly, just for you goats. Short version: https://vid8.poal.co/user/RomanSalute/wTtBlMM?autoplay=off Full version: https://vid8.poal.co/user/RomanSalute/jpfBPWn?autoplay=off The short version is just the good stuff. The full version is the entire newsreel and has a few minutes of random segments before the good stuff. A curious glimpse of history. The WEBM versions have the subtitles baked in and are a bit more compressed. The MKV versions have embedded soft subtitles, so they can be turned on and off, and the video and audio didn't need to be re-encoded and are the best quality I could find. You'll probably need to download the mkv version to view it. To my knowledge this has never been available in English to the general public. Not before the war, not during, and not after. Not until now. Why did Germany invade Poland? A question that often comes up when discussing WW2. Even here, people rarely know or have good answers. Even more rare than answers are sources. As with any war, the victors put a lot of effort into burying and discrediting any just cause their enemy might have had. This video lays out the German perspective, the situation they were in, the history that led up to it, and why they had to act. It explains how the territories in question, that Germany "invaded", were still Germany merely 20 years prior, before the Treaty of Versailles of 1919, and had been German for hundreds of years before that. It shows that Germans still lived on that land, and spoke German, and wanted to be German, and part of Germany. They had no interest in being Polish. They were just told one day that they must be. It shows German refugees fleeing those regions, their own homeland, that their ancestors had lived on for hundreds of years, because of the hunger and poverty and violence they suffered under Polish rule. Many of them testify that they are forbidden from teaching their children German, their own language, or sending them to German schools. Those who disobey are imprisoned or sent to Russia. Is it all just Nazi propaganda and lies? Maybe. My job is to show it to you. Yours is to decide what's true. But ask yourself: Why has nobody shown this to you before? Why would sharing this in Germany likely land you a cell next to Mrs Haverbeck? PS: No hard feelings for any Poles or Brits here. If you're reading this, you probably weren't around back then. And, bear in mind, they didn't have internet or places like Voat back then. If you never saw this until today, imagine how hopelessly clamped down and controlled the information available to the average Pole or Brit was back then. They had no chance to see the other side of things. That's how they were able to pit us against each other. Let's not let that happen again. PPS: I don't plan to share this anywhere else, except maybe Poal, as a housewarming gift. But that's largely the same crowd anyway. So, if you want more people to know about this, then that is up to you. It is not enough to merely believe. If you want to change the world, then you must be willing to act. For a contemporary analogy, consider this alternate timeline: In 1999, towards the end of his term, Bill Clinton hands over Texas and Oklahoma to Mexico "for diversity" or whatever Overnight, Americans living in Texas and Oklahoma are told they now live in and are subjects of Mexico Their citizenship is annulled, they are now Mexicans instead and cannot leave or visit family without a visa Obviously, actual Mexicans immediately flood in and take over the region, declaring it is now theirs They behave towards the (former) Americans as you can well imagine Over the next two decades conditions for Americans in that region worsen drastically Food shortages and violence become more and more common They are forbidden from teaching their children English They must only speak Spanish, or else the parents get thrown in jail or worse By 2018, former Americans begin fleeing into Kansas and Louisiana as refugees They are sick and miserable, many of them look half-starved They tell horror stories of abuse, watching loved ones being murdered, torn to pieces, fed to dogs by cartels Trump attempts to negotiate with Mexico, but they are standoffish Trudeau in Canada encourages all this, telling Mexico he's got their back (he doesn't) In 2019, all diplomacy having been rejected, Trump orders US troops to march into Texas and Oklahoma to protect Americans there The Media calls this "Trump invades Mexico" and condemns it Canada declares war but doesn't help Mexico. Eventually gets South American countries and China to join in Israel profits How would you feel about all this? How would you feel if you were stuck in Texas or OklahomaMexico? How would you feel if members of your family were stuck there, and you on the other side?

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

Summary style quote from elsewhere: "Germany sued for peace (-What the World Rejected-) multiple times before and during the war, even at the height of their power, offering to cede control of all occupied territories excepting those that were and had traditionally been inhabited by Germans. These peace offers were always rejected by the British.

They were not out to conquer Europe. They were out to regain what was stolen under the Treaty of Versailles, and to unite all Germans under one flag. Even the latter only applying to those who were willing to join.

They only occupied foreign territory out of strategic necessity, when Poland bombed them, and Britain and France declared war on them, for the crime of peacefully marching troops into territories that had been Germany 20 years prior, and for hundreds of years before that, and that were still inhabited by Germans, who were suffering and begging for help.

Imagine the following chain of events:

  • Bill Clinton allowed Mexico to annex Texas and Oklahoma as reparations or some such bullshit
  • Declared all Americans in those territories would now be Mexican citizens and had to stay there
  • Mexicans started moving into those areas and treating (former) Americans as second-class citizens
  • Over the course of 20 years, mistreatment turned into abuse
  • This is egged on by Mexican and Canadian government propaganda, and impotence of the now Obama government
  • American refugees - actual women, children, elderly - start fleeing into Kansas
  • They look miserable and malnourished, reporting horrible mistreatment and starvation
  • Images and videos of Americans beaten and murdered by Mexicans in those territories start appearing on-line daily
  • Now-President Trump marches the US Army into Texas and Oklahoma with instructions not to engage but to ensure Americans are safe
  • Mexico bombs the US Army as they are marching in, with Canada assuring them they've got their back

Imagine that, 80 years later, people refer to this chain of events as "Trump invaded Mexico". That's what it sounds like when people portray Germany as the conquest-hungry aggressor in WW2. Hitler didn't invade Poland. Hitler sent troops into Prussia and Silesia - historically German regions full of Germans that needed his help.

He invaded France only because the British and French declared war and amassed an army on the border to Germany with obvious intent to attack. He only occupied other regions to maintain strategic control of the region and prevent another invasion attempt from Britain. Notice how their cities were not sacked or burnt to the ground. Their women were not raped and murdered by the millions. Their farmers and animals didn't get gunned down by fighter pilots with instructions to shoot everything that moves. Their surrendered soldiers were not intentionally starved by the millions, caged in open fields with boxes full of shipments of food rotting next to them. Their towns didn't get thousands of tons of phosphorus dropped on them to ignite massive firestorms to burn everyone alive.

It was the noble "Allies" engaging in that sort of "warfare". To dominate and subjugate completely, and ultimately force their will upon future generations, by destroying literature, distorting history and imposing educational systems with the explicit intent of robbing the conquered of their pride and identity and finally their will to exist at all.

The notion of Germany being the wicked bad guys out for world domination in all this just does not stand up to even cursory scrutiny of objective facts.

"The territories in question that Germany "invaded", were still Germany merely 20 years prior, before the Treaty of Versailles of 1919, and had been German for hundreds of years before that.

Germans still lived on that land, and spoke German, and wanted to be German, and part of Germany. They had no interest in being Polish. They were just told one day that they must be.

German refugees fled those regions, their own homeland, that their ancestors had lived on for hundreds of years, because of the hunger and poverty and violence they suffered under Polish rule. Many of them testify that they are forbidden from teaching their children German, their own language, or sending them to German schools.

Those who disobey are imprisoned or sent to Russia."

Hitler’s Peace Offers, 1933-1939 (1940) http://ihr.org/other/what-the-world-rejected.html https://archive.vn/2qMQh

"Hitler did not want war in 1939 – and certainly not a general or global conflict. He earnestly sought a peaceful resolution of the dispute with Poland over the status of the ethnically German city-state of Danzig and the “Corridor” region, which was the immediate cause of conflict. The sincerity of his desire for peace in 1939, and his fear of another world war, has been affirmed by a number of scholars, including the eminent British historian A. J. P. Taylor. It was, of course, the declarations of war against Germany by Britain and France on Sept. 3, 1939, made with secret encouragement by US President Roosevelt, that transformed the limited German-Polish clash into a larger, continent-wide war." [...] "When Adolf Hitler came to the fore, Germany was as gagged and as helpless as the victors of 1918 intended her to be. Completely disarmed, with an army of only 100,000 men meant solely for police duties within the country, she found herself within a tightly closed ring of neighbors all armed to the teeth and allied together. To the old enemies in the West -- Britain, Belgium and France -- new ones were artificially created and added in the East and the South: above all Poland and Czechoslovakia. A quarter of the population of Germany was forcibly torn away from their mother country and handed over to foreign powers. The German Reich, mutilated on all sides and robbed of every means of defense, at any moment could become the helpless victim of a rapacious neighbor.

It was then that Adolf Hitler for the first time made his appeal to the common sense of the other powers. On May 17, 1933, a few months after his appointment to the post of Reich Chancellor, he delivered a speech in the German Reichstag that included the following passages:

  • “Germany will be perfectly ready to disband her entire military establishment and destroy the small amount of arms remaining to her, if the neighboring countries will do the same thing with equal thoroughness.
  • “... Germany is also entirely ready to renounce aggressive weapons of every sort if the armed nations, on their part, will destroy their aggressive weapons within a specified period, and if their use is forbidden by an international convention. “... Germany is ready at any time to renounce aggressive weapons if the rest of the world does the same. Germany is prepared to agree to any solemn pact of non-aggression because she does not think of attacking anybody, but only of acquiring security.”

No answer was received.

The other powers heedlessly continued to fill their arsenals with weapons, to pile up their stores of explosives, to increase the numbers of their troops. At the same time the League of Nations, the instrument of the victorious powers, declared that Germany must first undergo a period of "probation" before it would be possible to discuss with her the question of the disarmament of the other countries. On October 14, 1933, Hitler withdrew from the League of Nations, with which it was impossible to reach an understanding. Shortly afterwards, however, on December 18, 1933, he came forward with a new proposal for the improvement of international relations. This proposal included the following six points:

  • 1. Germany receives full equality of rights.
  • 2. The fully armed states undertake among themselves not to increase their armaments beyond their present level.
  • 3. Germany adheres to this agreement, freely undertaking to make only so much actual moderate use of the equality of rights granted to her as will not represent a threat to the security of any other European power.
  • 4. All states recognize certain obligations in regard to conducting war on humane principles, or not to use certain weapons against the civilian population.
  • 5. All states accept a uniform general supervision that will monitor and ensure the observance of these obligations.
  • 6. The European nations guarantee one another the unconditional maintenance of peace by the conclusion of non- aggression pacts, to be renewed after ten years.

[...] Once again Hitler's declarations did not receive the slightest response.

On the contrary, France made an alliance with Russia in order to further increase her predominance on the continent, and to enormously increase the pressure on Germany from the East.

Hitler attempted peace - it was rejected https://poal.co/s/History/336310 http://www.renegadetribune.com/what-the-world-rejected-hitlers-peace-offers-1933-1939/ https://archive.ph/V34JM

Also, here is some more relating to jews declaring war on Germany and Hitler's rejected peace offers, as well as that full book in PDF which is also illustrated with images not included on that site's page.

Judea Declares War On Germany https://pic8.co/sh/gW0pXO.jpeg

Who Declared War on Whom in 1939-1941? https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/nexus/NXdeclarations.html https://archive.vn/tuh83

"Germany is too strong. We must destroy her." -Winston Churchill, November 1936

"Germany's enemies maintain today that Adolf Hitler is the greatest disturber of peace known to history, that he threatens every nation with sudden attack and oppression, that he has created a terrible war machine in order to cause trouble and devastation all around him. At the same time they intentionally conceal an all-important fact: they themselves drove the Leader of the German people finally to draw the sword. They themselves compelled him to seek to obtain at last by the use of force that which he had been striving to gain by persuasion from the beginning: the security of his country. They did this not only by declaring war on him on September 3, 1939, but also by blocking step by step for seven years the path to any peaceful discussion."

"The fight against Germany has now been waged for months by every Jewish community, on every conference, in all labor unions and by every single Jew in the world. There are reasons for the assumption that our share in this fight is of general importance. We shall start a spiritual and material war of the whole world against Germany. Germany is striving to become once again a great nation, and to recover her lost territories as well as her colonies. But our Jewish interests call for the complete destruction of Germany…" -Valadimir Jabotinsky (Jew), in Mascha Rjetsch (January, 1934)

"Germany is the enemy of Judaism and must be pursued with deadly hatred. The goal of Judaism of today is: a merciless campaign against all German peoples and the complete destruction of the nation. We demand a complete blockade of trade, the importation of raw materials stopped, and retaliation towards every German, woman and child." Jewish professor A. Kulischer (October, 1937)

"Our fight against Germany must be carried to the limit of what is possible. Israel has been attacked. Let us, therefore, defend Israel! Against the awakened Germany, we put an awakened Israel. And the world will defend us." -Jewish author Pierre Creange in his book Epitres aux Juifs (1938)

"Germany must be turned into a waste land, as happened there during the 30-year War." -Das Morgenthau-Tagebuch, The Morgenthau Diary (p. 11)

"Kill the Germans, wherever you find them! Every German is our moral enemy. Have no mercy on women, children, or the aged! Kill every German — wipe them out!" -(jewish) Ilya Ehrenburg, Glaser (p. 111)

"In losing Germany, Jewry lost a territory from which it exerted power. Therefore it was determined to reconquer it." -Louis Marschalko, The World Conquerors: The Real War Criminals

https://poal.co/s/books/336466 Dr. Friedrich Stieve - What the World Rejected - Hitler's Peace Offers 1933-1940 https://pic8.co/sh/8ZXyJT.jpeg

"Written by Germany’s foremost diplomatic historian of the early twentieth century, this work maps out all the numerous times that Adolf Hitler made unconditional offers of peace to all the nations of Europe—and how the major anti-German belligerents, France and Britain, turned down these offers each and every time.

The author lists all of Hitler’s offers in detail, complete with quotes, starting with his first offer of May 17, 1933, his second offer of December 18, 1933, his third offer of May 21, 1935, his fourth offer of March 31, 1936, his fifth offer of September 30, 1938, his sixth offer of December 6, 1938, his seventh offer of late 1939 to Poland to settle the Danzig Corridor issue peacefully, and finally, his offer of world peace on October 6, 1939, just over a month after Britain and France had declared war on Germany for invading Poland on September 1 (but not on the Soviet Union, which also invaded Poland on September 17).

This edition benefits from four new sections which did not appear in the original publication. These are:

  • The full text of Hitler’s “Appeal for Peace and Sanity” speech, made before the Reichstag on July 19, 1940, following the fall of France. Although nearly half the British cabinet wanted to take up his offer, Churchill’s warmongering put an end to this final offer of peace;
  • Hitler’s Political Testament, dictated just hours before his death on April 29, 1945, wherein he spelled out once again how he had tried to avoid the war, and blamed Jewish agitators for the refusal of other nations to accept his peace offers;
  • Hermann Göring’s final letter—from this death cell in Nuremberg—to Winston Churchill, in which he blamed the latter’s warmongering on behalf of “Jewish Bolsheviks” for the conflict; and
  • An extract from The Forrestal Diaries, in which the US Secretary of the Navy James Forrestal quotes British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain as complaining that “the world Jews” have forced England into the war.

Fully reset and illustrated throughout with 22 rare photographs.

About the Author Dr. Friedrich Stieve (1884-1966) was Germany's foremost diplomatic historian of the first half of the twentieth century. He obtained his PhD in history at Heidelberg university, and during the First World War served as press attaché at the German Embassy Stockholm. From 1928 to 1932 he served as the German Ambassador in Riga, Latvia. And then from 1932 to 1939 served as the first head of the Cultural Policy Department of the Foreign Office. From 1933 to 1936 he was also Head of the Archives of the Political Archive of the Foreign Office"

https://archive.org/details/what-the-world-rejected_202102 https://usa1lib.org/book/5011468/248492 (updated link)

[–] • 2 pts

Awesome write-up! Saved here and elsewhere.

These parts of history are never shared in public education and almost nobody you come across irl will even know about these events.

[–] • 2 pts

I do not currently know, and also have not ever physically met, a single individual who is aware of even a fraction of a percent of the truth of reality (or has made any hints toward being aware but hiding their knowledge).

And worse, not one that I know will even look at the information when it is offered for them. Speak the information and my words are disregarded outright. Offer the documented evidence and they decline to even look at any of it.

And this isn't for extremely important topics like this post, they refuse to hear or read the truth even for the most minor of topics. Even discussing the chemicals in toothpaste, or in their drinking water, or in their gallon of store-bought milk.

Anything and everything that goes even remotely counter to their fantasy world narrative is a threat and either repeatedly disregarded or outright attacked.

[–] • 1 pt

Great work here and amazing writing.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Thank you.

Though possessing huge amounts of information is pointless if it all just sits in a folder on a computer collecting digital dust while we're murdered and erased from existence and history.

The jews did a piss-poor job of destroying the sources and availability of the truth over the last 80 years and there is practically an endless supply of factual information readily available to us.

No, it seems to me that the greatest hurdle holding back efforts to finally rid the world of the kike isn't lack of information or gaining access to or acquiring what information still remains. That hurdle is other people themselves. Overcoming the kikes' brainwashing and hold over other people's minds and getting them to listen to any of the information, look at any of the information, read any of the information, or even just not attack the one attempting to show/tell it to them is the biggest hurdle.

It becomes less of a challenge to overcome this brainwashing on some as the kikes' actions become more overt, but for others it makes it harder. There is so much information available, the information that one chooses to share with another to break through the brainwashing must be individually selected and tailored in how it is presented to find that weak spot in the dam that the information spike can be hammered into. Trying to use one piece of the truth could have the effect of reinforcing the dam instead of cracking it, while another selection shown to them could collapse it outright. It is a struggle to get through to anyone and, sadly, it takes a long time.

[–] • 1 pt

It's funny I see posts like this and go to follow and I already had because of quality content and then see I already am. I have an eye for talent and good posts. Thanks for them.

[–] • 1 pt

Excellent post, especially like the comparison at the end.

[–] • 1 pt

I saw someone asking about why Germany invaded Poland. Remembered I had this and felt the need to share it.

Hopefully it gives some insight to the people who were unsure about the subject.

[–] • 1 pt

Knowledge of why Hitler really indvaded Poland is really rare, even among Nationalists.

Lots of them would say they agree with his ideology, but don't support him since he invaded Poland (((for no reason at all))) and started another "brother war". The fact that war was already declared to him is another very obscure fact.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Great post and as my second in command I am glad you get along, but I knew it would be okay. I have an eye for potential.

[–] • 0 pt

Just a couple of decades before that Germany had played a vital role in eliminating the Christian populations of Asia Minor without much remorse. By maintaining von Papen at his position Germany continued the same policy. It's difficult to sympathize with the problems of the German minority in Poland when Germany did everything to wipe out thousands of years of white civilization in Anatolia.

[–] • 1 pt

https://www.academia.edu/7615797/Anatolia_as_a_Site_of_German_Colonial_Desire_and_National_Re_Awakenings

I'm reading this right now and I have some other things pulled up because it looks like I have to get a history lesson today.

Thanks...