WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

It wouldnt be easy, but i think it would be effective.

But we couldn't start by just banning weapons in the US. That would leave us vulnerable to invasion by foreign powers.

So we would have to start by demanding that all other nations ban weapons in unison with us.

Of course, if they didn't comply, we would have to declare war on them, in the name of peace.

A war to end all wars, you could call it.

We would have to use every weapon in our arsenal, including nukes, to dismatle the arms of other, disagreeing, countries.

Then we could take them over and start a one world state, where all weapons are banned.

Of course, this would leave the police being unarmed, without a competitive advantage, so we would just increase the ratio of police to population, and maybe encourage civilians to take up minor police work, like observing and reporting on neighbors committing suspicious acts.

But knives are dangerous too, so we should probably get rid of those.

Metal detectors at all public events.

But ghost knives are even more dangerous, ones that arent made out of metal. They just got banned in New York State by the govenor.

They're usually ceramic knives, but sometimes theyre as simple as a pencil or scape of wood! Really anything with a pointed tip or sharpened edge that could cause bodily harm to people.

So theyd be banned.

It might be a hassle for students(pencil), lawyers(pens), chefs(knives), construction workers(all tools), artists(pallet knives), sculptors(could make sharpened ceramic knives), doctors(no scalpels or needles), but it would be worth it, for a safer world, where our children could live in peace, unless they picked up a stick and hit another kid with it.

Sticks are dangerous, could be sharpened, and we have zero tolerance for antisocial behaviour.

Pretty good idea, right?

It wouldnt be easy, but i think it would be effective. But we couldn't start by just banning weapons in the US. That would leave us vulnerable to invasion by foreign powers. So we would have to start by demanding that all other nations ban weapons in unison with us. Of course, if they didn't comply, we would have to declare war on them, in the name of peace. A war to end all wars, you could call it. We would have to use every weapon in our arsenal, including nukes, to dismatle the arms of other, disagreeing, countries. Then we could take them over and start a one world state, where all weapons are banned. Of course, this would leave the police being unarmed, without a competitive advantage, so we would just increase the ratio of police to population, and maybe encourage civilians to take up minor police work, like observing and reporting on neighbors committing suspicious acts. But knives are dangerous too, so we should probably get rid of those. Metal detectors at all public events. But ghost knives are even more dangerous, ones that arent made out of metal. They just got banned in New York State by the govenor. They're usually ceramic knives, but sometimes theyre as simple as a pencil or scape of wood! Really anything with a pointed tip or sharpened edge that could cause bodily harm to people. So theyd be banned. It might be a hassle for students(pencil), lawyers(pens), chefs(knives), construction workers(all tools), artists(pallet knives), sculptors(could make sharpened ceramic knives), doctors(no scalpels or needles), but it would be worth it, for a safer world, where our children could live in peace, unless they picked up a stick and hit another kid with it. Sticks are dangerous, could be sharpened, and we have zero tolerance for antisocial behaviour. Pretty good idea, right?

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

We tried banning killing, and it didn't work.

So then we tried banning killing implements, and that was likewise a total shitshow.

Thus, I propose putting on our big brain hats and coming at this problem from a different angle: What if we instead made it illegal to get killed? Like, if you go out in public, get yourself shot, and then die, the government will spend several hundred thousand currency units to prosecute your corpse, and it will be very uncomfortable for everyone.

Personally, I think that anything's possible once one realises that we're really just making all this shit up as we go.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Pretty good? Dare I say it? This idea is... based.

Are non-metal knives actually illegal in NY? That's fucking retarded and unenforceable.

[–] 1 pt

No, it is completely enforceable as long as it isn't the primary charge.

i.e. I arrested you for x, but you are also carrying y on you, and it looks like you could stab someone with it, additional charge for that.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Just a tack-on BS charge. SMH that's what I was thinking too

[–] 2 pts

Except all the law-breakers will just keep theirs... Lets do the opposite and make them MANDATORY. If you want to be without a weapon you have to pay a fine and get a liscense. This will limit things you can do and will cost you a ton of money.

[–] 3 pts

But it would be illegal to break the law.

Checkmate, idiot.

[–] 1 pt

Yeah, thats why gun control laws work... because criminals and murders follow laws.

[–] 1 pt

babes... poal is as stupid as shit... the article must be mossad sarcasm...

[–] 1 pt

The only logical position.

[–] 1 pt

you idiots are retardeds, most likely mossad typists!,.... weapons are required by the constitution as citizens are required to storm the government and take up politicians and a government that does not represent the citizenry... by thus account, the citizens must be armed with the same weapons as the government stocks in order to fullfill citizens constitutional requirements as prescribed by our nations founding fathers!!!

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

You don't have a sense of humor, do you?

[–] -1 pt

reAl cUte bAbeS... plant psyop propagandas using "humor".... hows shitsreal these days.... typical dirty-yiddish-gypsy ploy!!!

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

I've been defeated! NOOOOOOOOoooooooooooo..... I'm turning into a laaaaaaaammmmpppshaaaaaaaddddeeeeeeeee.......~!

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Oh hey it's the crazy guy that calls people "babes" like a faggot, and calls niggers "sub saharan cannibals", I remember you from voat!

[–] 1 pt

Well, to be honest they are sub-saharan.. and often eat human flesh making them cannibals. So there is no argument there.

[–] 0 pt

meanwhile the subsaharan-african-cannibal "religion" is voodoo(eating people) while the culture produces zero commodities... though you dont need to grow a garden when you plan on eating your neighbor?!.

[–] 0 pt

lol... yous publicly declaring your stupidity that yous is clueless "niggers" are actually subsaharan-african-cannibals who's religion is voodoo(eating people) and who's culture produces zero commodities?!.

meAnwhile yous is mOre stupid by declaring the word "babes", which simply declares something is precious and deserves to be well taken care of... has any sexual connotation?!.

what rock have you been living unders?!.

[+] [deleted] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt

Just make your knifes out of edible plastics....eat whenever needed.