WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

259

People shouldn't go to a public space and then start shooting a bunch of people.

People shouldn't go to a public space and then start shooting a bunch of people.

(post is archived)

[–] 11 pts

Always good advice. Unless they shot at you first, then you get a pass.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Unless they shot at you first, then you get a pass.

This is the most correct and tolerable action, but in reality it is a catch 22 logical fallacy. We are all disadvantaged if someone already has their gun drawn, round chambered, finger on the trigger, and pointing it at people. If someone "gets the jump" on someone it is probably too late to respond, unfortunately. Sad it's like this.

This is why I only go in public with people who have more of a punch face than I have.

[–] 7 pts

My manifesto. If you are going to shoot people, shoot people responsible for your problem and not random people. That's why you know they are a coward. If they weren't a coward they would have shot more relevant people. I guess this guy did a slightly better job than Adam Lanza, but that's just by comparison. It's still not great.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

"I guess this guy did a slightly better job than Adam Lanza" if that Adam Lanza character was even real. I'm not one of those Qtards that think every shooting is a false flag but I think the top 3 most suspicious ones where Sandy Hook, Aurora Colorado, and Las Vegas.

[+] [deleted] 2 pts
[–] 0 pt

If Lanza's shooting was real, he killed 1 Kike. If it wasn't real, he made it less obvious that it was not real. By either measure, Lanza did a better job.

[–] 0 pt

Shooting a bunch of kids isn't going to solve your problems. Like we've all dealt with horrible people in the course of our lives. If you are going to go out in raging ball of fire, and you are going to take some people with you, kids are probably the least productive.

[–] 0 pt

Agreed... Who shot kids? The El Paso shooter(s)? That one was fake, of course they didn't shoot anyone productive to shoot.

[–] 0 pt

Kids are a very common target because it hurts society the most.

At least in China, there are a lot of people that are pissed off with "the system", or even more basic that that: you have stuff and I don't, and I can't figure out why. These people are pissed off because they've failed at everything and just want to cause as much destruction as possible. If they weren't retarded, they'd probably do their research and try to figure out WHY they've failed, and how to overcome the problems, or who is actually responsible.

That said, it's not as clear cut as we see it. After all, society at large ultimately voted for the systems we have now, and that's a hard pill to swallow. You can argue that they were manipulated or mislead, but they still bear some of the responsibility for their actions simply for the fact that they are adults.

But yes, that's why they go after kids.

[–] 1 pt

Ideally we could live in a world where no one has to shoot each other... But theeeeennnnn the invisible gov would have less means to exercise control

[–] 0 pt

But are wetbacks fully human like the rest of us?

Well, if 'a bunch of "people" ' are illegal aliens invading the country...

[–] 3 pts

Also does Isreal have nukes?

[–] 1 pt

I guess if they are invaders we need to change the laws so that it's legal to shoot them.

[–] -1 pt

no. we don't support shooting people who aren't a legitimate threat. glownigger.

[–] 0 pt

My manifesto is people shouldn't go to a public space because you'll probably get stabbed.

[–] 0 pt

Carry your own gun then. You can't tell crazy people what not to do.

[–] 1 pt

Just watch me

[–] 0 pt

You people are going to get poal taken down too.

[–] -1 pt

Very well, and gives me a good reason to dust off my flamethrower.