Yeah, his point is that he's exercising he freedom of speech to ignore a debate.
If he was forced to have a discussion with anyone who tries to talk to him, that wouldn't be freedom.
He hardly accepts any discussion or debate. Even talking with PMYB2 about having better behavior is dismissed on transsexual grounds. I get not wanting to be sucked into any debate, but he shuts down everything and in the same way.
Which is his right. Hence, Freedom of Speech.
Why are you defending him? He'll kill this website if we let him.
Do you think it would be reasonable to restrict the amount of submissions a user can make on a daily basis?
Because in the short time I've been here when I browsed /all/new it seemed like every second to third submission was a tranny accusation.
One or two more retards like that and all/new would be rendered useless. Someone dedicated to flood the website with irrelevant content will easily outcompete people who post real content.
Being supportive of this out of principle will make it easy to attack poal.
One or two more retards like that and all/new would be rendered useless.
Gaming the signal to noise ratio is also censorship. I'm glad at least two of us recognize it.
It wouldn't be a bad idea, I suppose. Except that it would simply encourage them to create even more accounts and point farm.
That's why the admins AOU and PMYB2 are working on giving the users the ability to block other users. That way they'll be doing their shilly shit and only the people who want to see that crap will see it.
I haven't seen a rule in the ToS against making multiple accounts and right now you don't even need a unique and valid e-mail address.
If they really wanted to they could just make a new account for every couple of submissions.
In saul alinskies rules for radicals one of the rules is "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.". It's about abusing the principle someone upholds in every way possible. That's basically what they are doing.
(post is archived)