WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

741

Oh boo hoo, some worm dude is upsetting you with his posts because you disagree with him.

Who cares? It's just one user. He's not even spamming. He's just posting his own shit and that's fine.

You realize you look like a massive faggot when you bitch about "I NO LIEK HOW SAYS THINGS!!!!"

Personally, I take the position of enjoying the weirdos.

Attack ideas, not people.

Oh boo hoo, some worm dude is upsetting you with his posts because you disagree with him. Who cares? It's just one user. He's not even spamming. He's just posting his own shit and that's fine. You realize you look like a massive faggot when you bitch about "I NO LIEK HOW @BLAHBLAH SAYS THINGS!!!!" Personally, I take the position of enjoying the weirdos. Attack ideas, not people.

(post is archived)

[–] -2 pt

Being dismissive infringes on peoples speech?

[–] 4 pts

People wanted to have a dialogue with you and every time you shut it down.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Yeah, his point is that he's exercising he freedom of speech to ignore a debate.

If he was forced to have a discussion with anyone who tries to talk to him, that wouldn't be freedom.

[–] 3 pts

He hardly accepts any discussion or debate. Even talking with PMYB2 about having better behavior is dismissed on transsexual grounds. I get not wanting to be sucked into any debate, but he shuts down everything and in the same way.

Do you think it would be reasonable to restrict the amount of submissions a user can make on a daily basis?

Because in the short time I've been here when I browsed /all/new it seemed like every second to third submission was a tranny accusation.

One or two more retards like that and all/new would be rendered useless. Someone dedicated to flood the website with irrelevant content will easily outcompete people who post real content.

Being supportive of this out of principle will make it easy to attack poal.

[–] -2 pt

So what?

[–] 1 pt

So, you never cared for the speech of others and your appeals to freedom of speech are self-serving.