You seem to think I am out to get you, which I am not. No need to be edgy. I merely asked if this is something you learned through Q's posts. .
> I'm suggesting that what "Style" did was set off a cultural movement that opened a lot of young men's eyes. From there, things spiraled out to a more refined version of itself, ultimately coaxing our "enemies" in to crafting systems wherein they could exploit us. The Red Pill was one of them, being Reddit's containment zone for anti-feminist rhetoric.
Yes that is what you wrote. Was it Q that informed you of this?
You tie Neil Strauss and TRP together and see 'incel' as the new term all the cool kids use - did you learn this from Q?
That doesn't sound like something a person taking me seriously would say.
Since you and apparently the other guy are confused by this, I didn't mean for any of the subjects to relate. The person, as I stated, seems very obviously new to... well, the internet in general. Why and how on earth could Q and the linguistic history of the word "incel" could be related is beyond me. I'm seriously confused as to how you and him have misunderstood this.
I simply know of the "pick-up" world history, more specifically in modernity. This doesn't mean I'm "involuntarily celibate", which is extremely kek worthy. Instead, I was clearing up the whole incel thing and why the term was both invented and eventually used. To answer your question, though, they don't relate. Q didn't inform me of anything that had anything to do with any other subjects I mentioned. I knew what needed to be known for a decent amount of time before Q even showed up. No, I don't mean days, weeks, or months, either.
The first paragraph I explained the guy pretty clearly hasn't been to /pol/ enough to know much about it, considering he clearly thinks all posts there are genuine when in reality it's maybe 70% at the most. I then attempted to convey that extremely detailed subjects can't be viewed in just a few day's time, they have to absorb tens of thousands of hours (and, while I haven't contributed that amount of time, it's at the very least the amount of time I've spent trying to take everything in). I ended with an explanation of the term "incel" and its history.
Also, if you're going to talk about me being "edgy", I'm... again, not going to take you seriously.
Let's start by recognizing I'm a trad wife. So by definition I'm going to always shit on Incels. Now go back and edit your pronouns faggot 😉
https://i.imgtc.ws/1hO7Sv0.png
Gender offers no value to one's capacity to rationalize. I guarantee you're not a serious of holes, but instead an autonomous creature with specific preferences, ambitions, and philosophies. You've no reason to invoke gender in a place of reason.
(post is archived)