Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

129

Seriously. I was an OG goat and finally, after two years, had enough watching the collective IQ of voat users go to crap after each migration. If you were part of the darkening/pol/qtards, et al migrations I am talking to you (faggot). GO AWAY, we don't want your bitter incel comments gumming up every thread here like they did at voat. Free speech means you can create a thread bitching about whatever you want and we won't care. But writing in a comment about your moronic politics on a thread that has nothing to do with your shitty politics is called being an asshole. Don't be an asshole. I think Putt is awesome and has done a kick ass job with what he has to work with. I also think and is awesome. Anyone I see bitching about all three of these guys is automatically on my personal faggot list.

Seriously. I was an OG goat and finally, after two years, had enough watching the collective IQ of voat users go to crap after each migration. If you were part of the darkening/pol/qtards, et al migrations I am talking to you (faggot). GO AWAY, we don't want your bitter incel comments gumming up every thread here like they did at voat. Free speech means you can create a thread bitching about whatever you want and we won't care. But writing in a comment about your moronic politics on a thread that has nothing to do with your shitty politics is called being an asshole. Don't be an asshole. I think Putt is awesome and has done a kick ass job with what he has to work with. I also think @PMYB2 and @AOU is awesome. Anyone I see bitching about all three of these guys is automatically on my personal faggot list.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (76).
[–] • 0 pt

You tie Neil Strauss and TRP together and see 'incel' as the new term all the cool kids use - did you learn this from Q?

I've never like Q because the happening is always right around the corner. "Soon my friends, soon". Maybe they aren't trying to gather people for a happening, but simply using it to get people to stick around long enough for them to get redpilled.

[–] • 1 pt

That seems like a pretty poor expression of what I wrote. Did you give up halfway through?

I'm suggesting that what "Style" did was set off a cultural movement that opened a lot of young men's eyes. From there, things spiraled out to a more refined version of itself, ultimately coaxing our "enemies" in to crafting systems wherein they could exploit us. The Red Pill was one of them, being Reddit's containment zone for anti-feminist rhetoric.

As for the part about Q, it would make endless amounts of more sense to recognize that not only are plenty of those messages likely not for anons or the wider audience as a whole, but that they could easily be for a unit that was told to look for a certain phrase years ago, who, upon seeing the phrase, will know to execute operation XXXX. Assuming people are correct and Q is some combination of white hat and patriot in top tiers of MIL or something of the nature, it would make sense for them to need to use disinformation at times. For instance, if your enemies believe that something potentially damaging might occur soon, they are likely to make some preparations to soften the blow. Should this occur, Q can try to nudge them by being suggestive so that they make hurried moves that might reveal their plans in such a way that might help Q team better understand their systems or have a chance at disrupting whatever they might be planning. To explain this more simply: sometimes disinfo can be used to bait your enemies in to reacting. This can be helpful in both understanding your enemy and planning furutue moves against them.

By the way, The Game (not exactly just the title of the book) has a much larger implication than most might realize. It was memetic in form. Take a second look. Think "pawn takes rook".

It's Chess. It's all chess.

[–] • 0 pt

You seem to think I am out to get you, which I am not. No need to be edgy. I merely asked if this is something you learned through Q's posts. .

> I'm suggesting that what "Style" did was set off a cultural movement that opened a lot of young men's eyes. From there, things spiraled out to a more refined version of itself, ultimately coaxing our "enemies" in to crafting systems wherein they could exploit us. The Red Pill was one of them, being Reddit's containment zone for anti-feminist rhetoric.

Yes that is what you wrote. Was it Q that informed you of this?

[–] • 0 pt

You tie Neil Strauss and TRP together and see 'incel' as the new term all the cool kids use - did you learn this from Q?

That doesn't sound like something a person taking me seriously would say.

Since you and apparently the other guy are confused by this, I didn't mean for any of the subjects to relate. The person, as I stated, seems very obviously new to... well, the internet in general. Why and how on earth could Q and the linguistic history of the word "incel" could be related is beyond me. I'm seriously confused as to how you and him have misunderstood this.

I simply know of the "pick-up" world history, more specifically in modernity. This doesn't mean I'm "involuntarily celibate", which is extremely kek worthy. Instead, I was clearing up the whole incel thing and why the term was both invented and eventually used. To answer your question, though, they don't relate. Q didn't inform me of anything that had anything to do with any other subjects I mentioned. I knew what needed to be known for a decent amount of time before Q even showed up. No, I don't mean days, weeks, or months, either.

The first paragraph I explained the guy pretty clearly hasn't been to /pol/ enough to know much about it, considering he clearly thinks all posts there are genuine when in reality it's maybe 70% at the most. I then attempted to convey that extremely detailed subjects can't be viewed in just a few day's time, they have to absorb tens of thousands of hours (and, while I haven't contributed that amount of time, it's at the very least the amount of time I've spent trying to take everything in). I ended with an explanation of the term "incel" and its history.

Also, if you're going to talk about me being "edgy", I'm... again, not going to take you seriously.