I actually don't even know what the darkening is... weirdly. I feel like I should, though.
/pol/ is dichotomous as hell. there's real people there doing real things, like anons and the autists (who... i guess are also anon, which is just now occurring to me. isn't it odd people always make a distinction?), and there's the normies (mostly journos) and shills. Pretty much anyone that has a bad perspective of /pol/ genuinely has little understanding of it. I was like you once, long ago. Hell, I was there to see the pool close. But, that was way back before /pol/.
But, Q is different. Man, if I could only adequately explain the giant shift that hit the internet in virtually any meaningful place over the last two years, your mind would be blown. Unfortunately, I'm not confident in my ability to relay to you the importance of this time frame. Maybe someone can help out. Hopefully it can suffice to say for now that unless you've put tens of thousands of hours in to something as complex as the Q phenomenon, I can see, quite easily, mind you, how you would do the whole "muh qoomers/qtards" thing.
Now, let's do the incel part: during the 90s a man names Neil Strauss wrote a book after a detailed and eventful journey of "investigating the 'pick-up' scene". This spawned a (whether any of you realize it yet or not) social movement intending to reverse the effects of feminism. This book was titled "The Game" and detailed an in-depth perspective of the life of a "pick-up artist". From there, many iterations followed like PUA (which, I guess was more or less refined in a modern sense by Mystery himself, but I suppose that's rather debatable), RSD, TRP (reddit... lol), etc.
During these iterations, again, without realizing it, young men who felt betrayed by the women in their lives (results of feminism/communism hybrid, not me pouting like a little child) were crafting methods for undoing and reversing feminism. Eventually, some of them realized it and became much more politically inclined. Now there exists a more legitimate spawn of such factions: swaths of young men who have learned the truth about Libido Dominandi and the repercussions that have unfolded because of our ancestors' complacency.
Of course, like they always do, enemies of truth-seekers have formed a straw man with which they can compete in order to demoralize young men so that they are persuaded not to go looking in rooms that are unmarked - signalling their being allowed to traverse such a subject. This gave birth to a new term with which MSM and their subsidiaries can battle - the "Incel". And what a word they've fathomed, the mark of the very thing that's suppose to demoralize us the most - virginity. Too bad for them we learned about the truths of such degeneracy which they've tried to cloak so we wouldn't see. We learned that men and women with higher numbers of sexual partners have shorter and less-fulfilling marriages. We learned about interbreeding, about the family unit and how it's important to be your children's guide in the world. We've learned all sorts of things that have been purposefully hidden from us - like things that are being shown to us (really, more normal people...) by Q.
I hope this clears some things up for you. You still seem pretty new around these parts... especially with this:
Anyone I see bitching about all three of these guys is automatically on my personal faggot list.
Your fear of criticizing authority makes you look feverish and unsure. Stand tall and fight for what you believe in. Not doing so can risk you looking weak and impotent. It's your right to be proven wrong. You really ought to assume such a privilege.
I actually expect and appreciate it when people call me out on my choices when they disagree.
It's almost like you're... sane.
Flattery will get you no where. I'm not PMing you my boobs
Yea I’ve been digging you. You’re an appropriate mix of affable, responsible and red pilled.
I suspect you are white and also straight
Lol everyone here knows what I am, I am straight, I am redpilled, I try to be responsible but I've been known to play a joke from time to time, I am mostly white but not completely.
I reject your ENTIRE Incel argument, just like I reject feminist arguments. I'm not gong to bother rebutting any of your quotes because they are from leaders or authors promoting something I simply don't prescribe to. You know why? Every man around me right now who is between the ages of 25 and 45 is married and has at least 2 to 11 children. The incel movement is a bunch of cry babies who are just as obnoxious as the feminazi's. They are the opposite side of the same coin. Grow up, be a man, find a trad wife, get married and have lots of babies. There are still plenty of women who want to do that. Stop feeling sorry for yourself.
I'm not even going to address your q-tard and /pol/ ramblings in much detail (but they do illustrate to the rest of us exactly why we call you q-tards. You don't make any sense and it's comical)
"giant shift that hit the internet"...how old are you? Because if you are any older than 12 you would recognize the entire internet has been shifting since it was created. That's the beauty of the internet. I long for the days of chatrooms. Shit, take me back there! If you honestly believe censorship of a few social media platforms is going to break the entire internet...I have a bridge in the desert I can sell you.
"Your fear of criticizing authority"...what on gawds green earth are you talking about? If you are implying the three users I quoted as being "authorities" hold my beer while I pee my pants laughing. I don't view them as authority at all. I view them as people I chat to on the internet who appear to be good people. Maybe if you talked to them one on one you would realize that too. In order for anyone to recognize something or someone as "authority", then that thing needs to have a hold over their life. Voat and Poal do not have that hold over my life in anyway. It's a shitty chatroom that I log into and read funny articles and make comments on, just shooting the shit with other users. It is recreation and a way to blow off steam. It's not some super powered underground internet tool that will somehow topple the evil "super government" that is "out to get you".
Your reply summerizes the kind of user I was directly talking about. Some over the top, board user who thinks that their crappy one off comments are somehow going to change the world. I've got news for you kiddo....lighten up. YOU are not going to put a dent in anything. Sorry to bust your bubble.
Now STOP SHITTING THIS PLACE UP!
ha it seems like you're just fucking with me.
nice chat, i suppose
Well I agree with him, I am celebate by choice. I got sick of sleeping with lazy sluts and decided to stop watching porn and just be a guy that sex isn't something I worry about or care about. Sure I miss a kiss and a hug once in a while but I do not miss sticking my dick into the wasteland a few men lost their paycheck till the kid turned 21 into. As for Q its military intelligence. There are likely some fake Q stuff but I think there is a real Q posting and I think the deep state will realize it really quickly also. As for the internet, you want no censorship then IRC is your friend still wild in a lot of those spaces. As for the posting many of us post stuff to get the real information out there for people that aren't good at finding REAL stuff like non fake news stories. We spread the stuff so the left is shown in its naked evil ways to voters that are not educated in the stuff me and many others are because we did our homework and searched for so long to find truth in all the bullshit.
You jumped around a lot without tying any of your points together. Not sure how "the internet changed a lot in the past 2 years", "I read a lot of Q shit", and "this is why incels exist" tie together.
Well that's just it, they were suppose to be explanations of various things the guy talked about.
They don't have to relate.
Primarily, I wanted to ease the denial of the Q thing to stoke curiosity. The "the internet has changed a bit in the last couple of years" part was to serve that purpose.
I wanted to explain incels because it's an obvious straw man to stifle trad exposure.
Finally, I wanted to mention that the Q thing is complex and that it takes time... LOTS of time, to really grt a good feel for things, especially if you don't have the perspective of the developing time line like someone like me has.
Hopefully this helps.
Oh so you and the other Qoomers are just special, that's it?
You tie Neil Strauss and TRP together and see 'incel' as the new term all the cool kids use - did you learn this from Q?
I've never like Q because the happening is always right around the corner. "Soon my friends, soon". Maybe they aren't trying to gather people for a happening, but simply using it to get people to stick around long enough for them to get redpilled.
That seems like a pretty poor expression of what I wrote. Did you give up halfway through?
I'm suggesting that what "Style" did was set off a cultural movement that opened a lot of young men's eyes. From there, things spiraled out to a more refined version of itself, ultimately coaxing our "enemies" in to crafting systems wherein they could exploit us. The Red Pill was one of them, being Reddit's containment zone for anti-feminist rhetoric.
As for the part about Q, it would make endless amounts of more sense to recognize that not only are plenty of those messages likely not for anons or the wider audience as a whole, but that they could easily be for a unit that was told to look for a certain phrase years ago, who, upon seeing the phrase, will know to execute operation XXXX. Assuming people are correct and Q is some combination of white hat and patriot in top tiers of MIL or something of the nature, it would make sense for them to need to use disinformation at times. For instance, if your enemies believe that something potentially damaging might occur soon, they are likely to make some preparations to soften the blow. Should this occur, Q can try to nudge them by being suggestive so that they make hurried moves that might reveal their plans in such a way that might help Q team better understand their systems or have a chance at disrupting whatever they might be planning. To explain this more simply: sometimes disinfo can be used to bait your enemies in to reacting. This can be helpful in both understanding your enemy and planning furutue moves against them.
By the way, The Game (not exactly just the title of the book) has a much larger implication than most might realize. It was memetic in form. Take a second look. Think "pawn takes rook".
It's Chess. It's all chess.
You seem to think I am out to get you, which I am not. No need to be edgy. I merely asked if this is something you learned through Q's posts. .
> I'm suggesting that what "Style" did was set off a cultural movement that opened a lot of young men's eyes. From there, things spiraled out to a more refined version of itself, ultimately coaxing our "enemies" in to crafting systems wherein they could exploit us. The Red Pill was one of them, being Reddit's containment zone for anti-feminist rhetoric.
Yes that is what you wrote. Was it Q that informed you of this?
(post is archived)