WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

823

"Not all ___(muslims, men, whatever) __" ; "Yes all ___(muslims, men, whatever)____"

One line of thinking has to be true and one must be false. The most intuitive is the former, because even if the generalization is accurate, there are counter-examples -- so many conflicting anecdotes. And also, even if the generalization is true, it's not fair that someone might be pre-judged based on a group characteristic even if there's a 95%, 50%, or only 5% chance they embody that characteristic. Our society should encourage and promote good character, not 'class', and in order to do that we can't judge books by their cover.

But I am starting to feel like the truth is the latter case. Which means yes all white men, and yes all muslims (and all cops, and all niggers, and all faggots). The so-called "outliers" of your group reflect a facet of the collective spirit. And *if your group has more of a certain type of outlier (bombers, altruists, thieves), then that is a characteristic of your group even if it is only displayed in a minority. *

Once you accept this paradigm, then it becomes very important to whom different newsworthy events are attributed. This is why so many people have a hard-on for a Muslim Notre Dame arsonist, or go to great lengths to show that most early American slavers were and most Hollywood pedos and sexual abusers are actually kikes, and fairly point out that Mexican criminals are counted as whites even though they shouldn't be.

Then again, do rational white people want to be in league with the castrated, spineless, self-flagellating faggots that seem to typify our race? Are pop culture's pathetic brainwashing attempts enough to excuse these worms (and our race) from the characteristic of willful, grovelling self-abasement? This is the downside of collective responsiblity.

Maybe whites shouldn't feel guilty, but rather they should feel ashamed. Ashamed because all of the pussy-bitch fuck bois and thots that embody our races' character. You can write them off and say 'oh, that's not the norm', BUT if your group has more of a certain type of outlier (fuckbois, thots, cucks), then that is a characteristic of your group even if it is only displayed in a minority.

OR, you can argue 'it's because of the Jewish brainwashing they're like this' and then you can basically replace ' being a fuckboi/thot/cuck' in the previous statement with 'retards who are susceptible to jewish brainwashing.' That Jewish brainwashing exists is not an excuse for falling for Jewish brainwashing. It's as much of a failing as being one of these kinds of aforementioned faggots in the first place.

I feel ashamed of my race. If you are white, can you give me a reason we should not be ashamed?

The only alternative is to believe not all muslims are shit people and not all niggers are violent thieves. Individualism is appealing until you consider its consequences (lying to yourself). Not even niggers (who have the most reason to believe they are individual actors, independent from the rest of their group) can stomach it, because they know it's just not true.

"Not all ___(muslims, men, whatever) __" ; "Yes all ___(muslims, men, whatever)____" One line of thinking has to be true and one must be false. The most intuitive is the former, because even if the generalization is accurate, there are counter-examples -- so many conflicting anecdotes. And also, even if the generalization is true, it's not fair that someone might be pre-judged based on a group characteristic even if there's a 95%, 50%, or only 5% chance they embody that characteristic. Our society should encourage and promote good character, not 'class', and in order to do that we can't judge books by their cover. But I am starting to feel like the truth is the latter case. Which means *yes all white men*, and *yes all muslims* (and all cops, and all niggers, and all faggots). The so-called "outliers" of your group reflect a facet of the collective spirit. And *if your group has more of a certain type of outlier (bombers, altruists, thieves), then that is a characteristic of your group even if it is only displayed in a minority. * Once you accept this paradigm, then it becomes very important to whom different newsworthy events are attributed. This is why so many people have a hard-on for a *Muslim* Notre Dame arsonist, or go to great lengths to show that most early American slavers were and most Hollywood pedos and sexual abusers are actually kikes, and fairly point out that Mexican criminals are counted as whites even though they shouldn't be. Then again, do rational white people want to be in league with the castrated, spineless, self-flagellating faggots that seem to typify our race? Are pop culture's pathetic brainwashing attempts enough to excuse these worms (and our race) from the characteristic of willful, grovelling self-abasement? This is the downside of collective responsiblity. Maybe whites shouldn't feel guilty, but rather they should feel **ashamed**. Ashamed because all of the pussy-bitch fuck bois and thots that embody our races' character. You can write them off and say 'oh, that's not the norm', BUT *if your group has more of a certain type of outlier (fuckbois, thots, cucks), then that is a characteristic of your group even if it is only displayed in a minority.* OR, you can argue 'it's because of the Jewish brainwashing they're like this' and then you can basically replace ' being a fuckboi/thot/cuck' in the previous statement with 'retards who are susceptible to jewish brainwashing.' That Jewish brainwashing exists is not an excuse for falling for Jewish brainwashing. It's as much of a failing as being one of these kinds of aforementioned faggots in the first place. I feel ashamed of my race. If you are white, can you give me a reason we should not be ashamed? The only alternative is to believe not all muslims are shit people and not all niggers are violent thieves. Individualism is appealing until you consider its consequences (lying to yourself). Not even niggers (who have the most reason to believe they are individual actors, independent from the rest of their group) can stomach it, because they know it's just not true.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Our society should encourage and promote good character, not 'class', and in order to do that we can't judge books by their cover.

At the end of the day, all Muslims worship the same pedophile misogynist schizophrenic warlord. Their end goal is to convert the entire world into a caliphate.

Edit:

[–] 1 pt

Exactly. Muslim extremists commit terrorism. Moderate Muslims support Muslim extremists.