This entire thesis is based on the idea that all of our societal problems can be based on one thing, and to this nutjob (and you apparently) that's race. I just don't agree at all. It is to simplistic to say if we get rid of all the (insert race of choice here) everything gets better. I think if you buy into that belief you are very nieve.
I think you're making a strawman here. No one is saying a monoracial society would solve all problems. You've put an indefensible argument into my mouth so it'll be easier to dismiss me.
"Western society is being invaded by a historical enemy"
What else could you possibly mean?
"Western society is being invaded by a historical enemy"
Exactly what I said. That does not mean "all of our societal problems can be based on one thing, [...] race".
I don't think it's a wild claim that Muslims are a historical enemy of the west. You could argue over the semantics of the term invasion (since governments are allowing it), but at the very least large-scale immigration is not controversial.
(post is archived)