WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

720

Draw your own conclusions. I'm not trying to address the JQ or anything. I just find it interesting the most liberal of these sources strikes me as having sympathy for the perpetrator.

[Woman, 100, killed by mugger desperate for cash, court hears](https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/feb/04/woman-100-killed-by-mugger-desperate-for-cash-court-hears) [Holocaust survivor, 100, died after breaking her neck when a mugger, 40, who saw her as an 'easy target' grabbed her from behind and stole her bag, court hears](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6666173/Widow-100-died-breaking-neck-mugger-stole-bag.html) [Sofija Kaczan death: Woman, 100, 'killed by bag snatcher'](https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-derbyshire-47121982) Draw your own conclusions. I'm not trying to address the JQ or anything. I just find it interesting the most liberal of these sources strikes me as having sympathy for the perpetrator.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

First line of the guardian article

A “vulnerable” 100-year-old woman was killed by a mugger who was so desperate for money that he needed an easy target to steal from, a court has heard.

Why the fuck is vulnerable in quotes? Of course they're vulnerable. They're 100 fucking years old.

[–] 1 pt

Because fuck old people right? Ask some lefties about that one, many of them I’ve spoken with will tell you there should be rules against living too long because of the resources you consume when elderly

[–] 0 pt

Reminds me of this guy, he advocates post birth abortions b/c "the infant can't survive on it's own" or whatever the fuck else I've read about him. That's not a direct quote but that's the gist of it.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/16/peter-singer-princeton-bioethics-professor-faces-c/