![No, man. I'm not addicted. I just like doing it everyday and get irritable if I don't. [1080x1080 - 89KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/AJhznb.jpg){kind=link}
They come off arrogant and condescending. Also, they are hypocritical when they call people heretics for holding to baptism of desire/blood yet they don't label Pope St. Pius X, St. Alphonsus Liguori, and many other Saints heretics who held to the same beliefs.
What do you believe is their heretical belief?
Why do you consider them schismatic?
Too many to list. but we can start with the fact that according to them literally everyone that is not them, is going to hell. Maybe we can add the fact that they lied about being ordained., Or maybe we can talk about how they think that the Church has been destroyed and only exists in spirit, in faithfuls like them and their only brother (and protestants who think like them). Or how they think they have the judgment to decide whether a pope is duly elected, or not. or how they have think they have the authority to declare a certain pope heretical, even though they are neither ordained in the Church nor affiliated with any order that is actually Catholic. Or how they think they are the remnant of the Chuch and it is rome that has split from them. They are also proven liars who shy not away from judging all of humanity where St MIchael would not even judge one soul. They are also not benedictines as they claim to be as benedictines don't reject the authority of the See of Peter. They are schismatics because they reject the authority of the current and past popes, which no one on earth has the authority to do. Literally no one, not even the cardinals can make that judgment, let alone these uncharitable "converts". They are false teachers. These liars are demons trying to lead people away from the truth in much the same way that the pharisees did.
I don't agree with all their beliefs, but they do give strong arguments on certain topics. I think they have helped convert many protestants. They don't reject the authority of the See of Peter. They just believe that the VII popes are not really popes but antipopes. I take it you're not a sede.
The only logical conclusion is sedevacantism which I've come to realize. You can't be in communion with a heretic. All the VII papal claimants are heretics and anti-popes. This doesn't require a declaration. Heretics are automatically excommunicated ipso facto. That's in canon law and also what St. Robert Bellarmine taught. A manifest heretic cannot be a Pope. To say that you can have a heretic as a Pope is to say that Christ lied about his Church. To argue that Francis or the other VII popes didn't commit heresy is just ridiculous. They are leading souls to hell. There is no doubt about that. They don't have the Catholic faith. They have the VII religion which isn't Catholicism. All the bishops and priests in communion with Francis are leading people to hell with that counterfeit religion that calls itself Catholic. Just think of all those marriage annulments that are passed out like candy. They are sending those people to hell.
We don't follow the pope, we follow the teachings of the magesterium. you don;t have the authority to declare anything about anyone, however heretical, that is occupying the the Holy See. , But yet you go further, in being a sede, you declare that all those that got ordained since then are invalid and so are the sacraments they administer. which means that although you are much holier than those you presume to judge, you are not actively living a catholic life. YOu are sittoinmg at home, fully content in your judgment of all others and the doctrine of the Church. you are literally protestant. also it does betray a total lack of faith in the Father and the Holy Spirit, which you believe can be outmanoeuvered on some kind of techinicality. are you jewish?
(post is archived)