WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

767

It must have something to do w rape but the fact that we have no go-to term and shared concept is probably keeping a Womens Studies professor employed.

Maybe "violated?" "Defiled?" Are therr women here yet to weigh in?

It must have something to do w rape but the fact that we have no go-to term and shared concept is probably keeping a Womens Studies professor employed. Maybe "violated?" "Defiled?" Are therr women here yet to weigh in?

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Who cares?

Now where is my sammich, bitch?

[–] 1 pt

For example in your attempt at humor you are (unknown word)ing women by implying their womanly dignity is shared w all subway wage workers which is gay.

[–] 0 pt

Trivializing the category of womanhood isn't the same thing as indicating to a woman that she doesn't measure up to the picture of femininity.

When a woman emasculates a male, she isn't trivializing masculinity. She is telling him he doesn't match up categorically.

You could say that a man exogynates a woman when he does the same thing to her.

It's not a term I think will catch any time soon. I just prefer to say that you 'shame them'.

[–] 0 pt

Oooh that's a good word we're over the target lol

Who says I was kidding, bitch?

[–] 0 pt

I was almost certain you were serious

[–] 0 pt

Everyone w any impulse toward socializing, everyone w even a glimmer of gratitude in their being, everyone w even a fragment of sensation of compulsion to duty. Pretty universally important question