![Anon follows the money [927x6648 - 1.17MB]](https://pic8.co/sh/P2Pt9X.png){kind=link}
Be specific. What assumptions are wrong? What are examples of his rudimentary understanding?
I agree he would be hard pressed to show the political affiliation of draftees because I guarantee that information is not available and he was assuming.
I'm not going to do that. It takes too long to teach people who don't understand how the system works and when I've tried it in the past they usually end up not believing it anyway because they don't know enough about it.
I'm comfortable just suggesting that you take that part with a grain of salt and leaving it at that. Feel free to take yourself down that rabbit hole if you like.
In other words, you can't explain why, and are just well poisoning.
Only a moron would take a post a guy made where he says himself he's reading about these things for the first time and believe that it is true then insist that the burden of proof is on anyone who disagrees to rebut it. If you agree with everything in that post then prove to me you know what you're talking about by explaining why you believe it is correct along with references and when I can find the time I'll clarify the places where you are misunderstanding things.
I'm not opposed to doing my own research, but would really appreciate any carrots you could provide to set it off in the right direction.
Look into derivatives debt. All the big banks owe 30-60 trillion in derivative debt to the central banks that they also own (Rockefellers etc). The law changed in 2012, in a bank collapse first entity to get anything is who they owe derivative debt to (themselves), then shareholders, then "unsecured investors" in the bank, ie you. They have it set up so they can basically just steal everything in the bank and all the property and holdings of the bank itself. Jews be Jewing.
(post is archived)