![Anon follows the money [927x6648 - 1.17MB]](https://pic8.co/sh/P2Pt9X.png){kind=link}
There are a bunch of inaccuracies in there but his conclusion to prioritize community building and barter is sound.
Which parts are inaccurate? I didn't see anything I knew to be wrong when I read it, but I may have missed something.
His understanding of the financial system is pretty rudimentary and a lot of his assumptions based on his rudimentary understanding are incorrect.
He also seems to be just assuming that the draft is going to result in more conservatives being made into soldiers than liberals. He would be hard pressed to support that argument with actual facts and historical information. There were over 10 million draftees in ww2 and only 45 thousand claimed to be concientous objectors. At that time most of them were pacifists for religious reasons. There's no reason to assume they would vote for democrats the rest of their lives after surviving the war.
It may not have been intentional: draft boards selected strong, hardworking men.
Pansies and effeminate men were held out.
A correlation of even a few percent could account for a lot.
Be specific. What assumptions are wrong? What are examples of his rudimentary understanding?
I agree he would be hard pressed to show the political affiliation of draftees because I guarantee that information is not available and he was assuming.
His understanding of the financial system is pretty rudimentary and a lot of his assumptions based on his rudimentary understanding are incorrect.
Yet you do not correct them.
barter
Bitcoin solves this.
Except Bitcoin is tracked and you owe taxes on Bitcoin. So not really.
Do you owe taxes when you use it or when you convert it to fiat currency?
It's still not controlled by Jews.
Hegelian dialectic. It solves a problem that they created in the first place. Still tracked too.
trade fiat for fiat. got it.
(post is archived)