"It is neccessary that I should die for my people; yet my spirit will rise from the grave and the world will know that I was right. "-Adolf

You're right.
Didn't have strong enough navy or air force.
You're right but taking prisoners would be better than massacring.
Unlike Allies, killing civilians was never his aim. Plus, During and after Dresden, Luftwaffe was non-existent.

parent
link

[–] • 5 pts

Of all world leaders alive in the last hundred years, none was a more generally decent human being than Adolf Hitler. In terms of moral character, he stood head-and-shoulders above every other ruler of the age.

link

[–] • 4 pts

Which is why they will work tirelessly to tear down his image.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

So going into the village of Lidice, lining up all the Czech men and boys 15 or older and killing them all in the town square is what a decent human would do?

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Wiki says the population of Lidice is around 600. The Lidice Massacre was in response to the killing of a top officer - Reinhard Heydrich. Any other world leader of the time would have expanded the scope of their reprisal to the provincial level, and wouldn’t have set an age limit. They’d have also turned loose one of their favored divisions to rape and pillage.

And then, you’d never have heard about it, because it’d be lost in the sea of atrocities committed by the world leaders who weren’t Hitler. By contrast the jew world order finds whatever they can to blackwash the German National Socialist regime, and this is the “best” they can find.

Being a ruler is fraught with unpopular decisions. Find one single other ruler from this era on a national level, who did not commit far worse atrocities. Again and again, in the case of Hitler, you find incredible restraint. It pretty obviously ended up costing him the War; see Dunkirk. He didn’t feel like senselessly slaughtering a bunch of White people retreating. It was an absolute disaster for Germany. Is Hitler honored for this decision? No. In the context of war it was a stupid mistake. Some (Miles Mathis) even go so far as to claim Dunkirk all but proves Hitler was controlled opposition. But I personally think it’s because he didn’t have the stomach for wholesale slaughter on that scale.

If you’re going to take this as endorsement somehow of the Lidice Massacre, go fuck yourself. My argument isn’t an endorsement, it’s a recognition that all world leaders have events like this and worse under their belts. Anyone else in the same position would do worse, or else risk losing hold of power to make way for someone who will.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

(edited )

The killing of Heydrich was in response to the invasion and subjugation of Czechoslovakia (Kingdom of Bohemia and Moravia) so your reasoning in this matter is wrong. If Germans hadn't invaded, then there would be no reason to kill a "top German officer" now would there? Otherwise I completely agree with you. The fact is Germans had built up quite an army just before they invaded Czechoslovakia but there campaign would have most likely ended before it even started if they had to take Czech by force. There are 2 reasons for this, the special bunkers Czechs had that could withstand direct hits from heavy artillery and also bombing and the fact that Hitler fully equipped 33 divisions with Czech armament, not to mention the LT vz. 38 tanks that were renamed Panzer 38T and used extensively on the attack of France so if Czechs decided to fight Germans would lose this major advantage.

I just hate when people worship Hitler, he caused so many good White alpha males to be slaughtered for nothing and to top it all off created the shield by which all jews hide behind still today.