![It's time to leave - seriously [1836x1087 - 190KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/2t8DeN.jpg){kind=link}
Both american abolition and civil rights movements were republican, second, they were the ones with the strongest religious rhetoric and religious ties.
It was the opposing sides of each conflict that took a more darwinian approach to considering the consequences of the two races to live with each other.
So neither liberal nor atheist was a correct description.
Both american abolition and civil rights movements were republican, second, they were the ones with the strongest religious rhetoric and religious ties.
It was the opposing sides of each conflict that took a more darwinian approach to considering the consequences of the two races to live with each other.
So neither liberal nor atheist was a correct description.
>civil rights movements were republican
ya being republican vs being Christian isnt the same thing at all. the people opposing them were actual Christians. while those in favor were Zionists and atheists
>So neither liberal nor atheist was a correct description.
Actually it was, both. but maybe it doesnt suit your narrative so you try to change things
>>civil rights movements were republican
ya being republican vs being Christian isnt the same thing at all. the people opposing them were actual Christians. while those in favor were Zionists and atheists
>>So neither liberal nor atheist was a correct description.
Actually it was, both. but maybe it doesnt suit your narrative so you try to change things
(post is archived)