Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.5K

If someone breaks in to your home, you need one gun to defend yourself and end the life of the criminal. You need the other gun to plant on them to prove you had good cause to kill them.

This second gun should be a cheap-ish pistol, utterly clean of your prints and DNA, and loaded with bullets you’ve never actually touched and have no more of in the house. Obviously there should be no paperwork linking this gun to you. Yes there are ways to clean a gun and store it such that no trace of you exists on it. And if it’s ever claimed that your DNA is on the gun, it clearly got there in the scuffle.

I live in an absolute liberal mecca. I will not tolerate criminals desecrating my home or threatening my family. If ever this nightmare scenario should come to pass, cops will see me, the upstanding homeowner (tax payer) defending myself from a criminal with a gun. Pretty much case closed.

I’m sure others will have good advice about this and I want to hear it. This is just my humble opinion.

Oh - and don’t think an 80% gun is t linked to you unless you bought the entire kit for cash.

If someone breaks in to your home, you need one gun to defend yourself and end the life of the criminal. You need the other gun to plant on them to prove you had good cause to kill them. This second gun should be a cheap-ish pistol, utterly clean of your prints and DNA, and loaded with bullets you’ve never actually touched and have no more of in the house. Obviously there should be no paperwork linking this gun to you. Yes there are ways to clean a gun and store it such that no trace of you exists on it. And if it’s ever claimed that your DNA is on the gun, it clearly got there in the scuffle. I live in an absolute liberal mecca. I will not tolerate criminals desecrating my home or threatening my family. If ever this nightmare scenario should come to pass, cops will see me, the upstanding homeowner (tax payer) defending myself from a criminal with a gun. Pretty much case closed. I’m sure others will have good advice about this and I want to hear it. This is just my humble opinion. Oh - and don’t think an 80% gun is t linked to you unless you bought the entire kit for cash.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (174).
[–] • 1 pt

Bullshit. Handguns with suppressors are still loud. The only make silent pews in hollywood bullshit flicks Barrel length is everything there. My .22wmr with a 22" barrel is WAY WAY WAY quieter than my .22lr pistol with the same suppressor on both. A .45 pistol is still going to be loud even with a suppressor due to the short barrel length. Time to play ho est answer: do you own a single fucking suppressor?

[–] [deleted] • -3 pt (edited )

I was in a gun store one day many years ago and the owner pulled out a 1911, put a can on it and shot it into a backstop.

The sound of the bullet hitting the backstop and the action cycling was loud but there is no other sound.

That's why I went with that particular combination myself so spare me your amazing knowledge about 22s, moron.

A .45 isn't a .22, you dickless little worm.

[–] • 2 pts

I find that hard to believe. Even if he used subsonic ammo.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Standard .45 ammo used by the military is subsonic.

https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/what-was-the-original-velocity-of-45-acp-hardball.826882/#:~:text=45A%2C%20230%20gr%20FMJ%20bullet,830%20fps%20at%2025%20yards.

Here's a thought, actually get a 1911, put a suppressor on it and shoot it indoors.

Man, you guys know dick about guns, I'll give you that much.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

No, a .22 isnt a .45. A .45 is significantly louder. Youre full of shit. You didnt answer me. Do you actually own a suppressor? I own 2. Im familiar with their limitations

[–] [deleted] • -2 pt (edited )

No, it's not louder, since it is subsonic. It's no louder than a high powered air gun. You are full of shit and have no experience in the matter.

Go fuck your mother.