Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

If someone breaks in to your home, you need one gun to defend yourself and end the life of the criminal. You need the other gun to plant on them to prove you had good cause to kill them.

This second gun should be a cheap-ish pistol, utterly clean of your prints and DNA, and loaded with bullets you’ve never actually touched and have no more of in the house. Obviously there should be no paperwork linking this gun to you. Yes there are ways to clean a gun and store it such that no trace of you exists on it. And if it’s ever claimed that your DNA is on the gun, it clearly got there in the scuffle.

I live in an absolute liberal mecca. I will not tolerate criminals desecrating my home or threatening my family. If ever this nightmare scenario should come to pass, cops will see me, the upstanding homeowner (tax payer) defending myself from a criminal with a gun. Pretty much case closed.

I’m sure others will have good advice about this and I want to hear it. This is just my humble opinion.

Oh - and don’t think an 80% gun is t linked to you unless you bought the entire kit for cash.

If someone breaks in to your home, you need one gun to defend yourself and end the life of the criminal. You need the other gun to plant on them to prove you had good cause to kill them. This second gun should be a cheap-ish pistol, utterly clean of your prints and DNA, and loaded with bullets you’ve never actually touched and have no more of in the house. Obviously there should be no paperwork linking this gun to you. Yes there are ways to clean a gun and store it such that no trace of you exists on it. And if it’s ever claimed that your DNA is on the gun, it clearly got there in the scuffle. I live in an absolute liberal mecca. I will not tolerate criminals desecrating my home or threatening my family. If ever this nightmare scenario should come to pass, cops will see me, the upstanding homeowner (tax payer) defending myself from a criminal with a gun. Pretty much case closed. I’m sure others will have good advice about this and I want to hear it. This is just my humble opinion. Oh - and don’t think an 80% gun is t linked to you unless you bought the entire kit for cash.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (174).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

I didn't even look at what you posted, for all I know it was a picture of your nigger mom's saggy old tits.

You have no knowledge of suppressors, nor do you own any, you don't even know that a .45 round is subsonic. You're probably not even old enough to smoke crack. lol

Look man, no offense but go fuck your scummy old crack whore of a mother. I don't need you shitting up my inbox with your retard monkeyshines, boy. This ain't no fucking circus.

[–] • 0 pt

Well look at the pic. Its proof i own suppressors, while you wont even answer if you own one. .45 ammo being subsonic is irrelevant. Im telling you subsonic .22lr out of a pistol is louder than hypersonic .223 out of a rifle, and i proved i know what im talking about. Barrel length is huge. Suppressors reduce noise, they dont eliminate it, and the shorter the barrel the louder the report, even with subsonic ammo.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

None of that means anything, boy and uh subsonic 22lr is not louder than a .223, not that ANY of that is relevant here.

You've never shot .45 out of a suppressed 1911 so shut up about it. Eat a dick.

[–] • 0 pt

No, i havent shot that specific caliber. And yes .subsonic .22lr from a pistol is louder than .223 from a rifle due to barrel length. Ive posted proof that i own both suppressed, while you wont even say you own a suppressor without proof. Calling me "boy" adds no legitimacy to your shit. My posting proof of suppressor ownership absolutely does add legitimacy to my claims.