Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

956

If someone breaks in to your home, you need one gun to defend yourself and end the life of the criminal. You need the other gun to plant on them to prove you had good cause to kill them.

This second gun should be a cheap-ish pistol, utterly clean of your prints and DNA, and loaded with bullets you’ve never actually touched and have no more of in the house. Obviously there should be no paperwork linking this gun to you. Yes there are ways to clean a gun and store it such that no trace of you exists on it. And if it’s ever claimed that your DNA is on the gun, it clearly got there in the scuffle.

I live in an absolute liberal mecca. I will not tolerate criminals desecrating my home or threatening my family. If ever this nightmare scenario should come to pass, cops will see me, the upstanding homeowner (tax payer) defending myself from a criminal with a gun. Pretty much case closed.

I’m sure others will have good advice about this and I want to hear it. This is just my humble opinion.

Oh - and don’t think an 80% gun is t linked to you unless you bought the entire kit for cash.

If someone breaks in to your home, you need one gun to defend yourself and end the life of the criminal. You need the other gun to plant on them to prove you had good cause to kill them. This second gun should be a cheap-ish pistol, utterly clean of your prints and DNA, and loaded with bullets you’ve never actually touched and have no more of in the house. Obviously there should be no paperwork linking this gun to you. Yes there are ways to clean a gun and store it such that no trace of you exists on it. And if it’s ever claimed that your DNA is on the gun, it clearly got there in the scuffle. I live in an absolute liberal mecca. I will not tolerate criminals desecrating my home or threatening my family. If ever this nightmare scenario should come to pass, cops will see me, the upstanding homeowner (tax payer) defending myself from a criminal with a gun. Pretty much case closed. I’m sure others will have good advice about this and I want to hear it. This is just my humble opinion. Oh - and don’t think an 80% gun is t linked to you unless you bought the entire kit for cash.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (174).
[–] • 0 pt

No, i havent shot that specific caliber. And yes .subsonic .22lr from a pistol is louder than .223 from a rifle due to barrel length. Ive posted proof that i own both suppressed, while you wont even say you own a suppressor without proof. Calling me "boy" adds no legitimacy to your shit. My posting proof of suppressor ownership absolutely does add legitimacy to my claims.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

Thank you for admitting that you have no experience shooting a suppressed .45.

Yeah, no it isn't because I shoot both. An AR is way louder than supersonic .22 so shut your dick hole.

You are a boy and a nigger.

Your idiocy posting your shit online (your claim, I didn't look) is proof that you are a dumb nigger.

[–] • 0 pt

You refuse to look at my proof, and still refuse to answer my question, you just keep calling me boy and nigger. Real cute. You dont have a leg to stand on. But you expect me to believe a suppressed .45 is noiseless when a suppressed .22lr with subsonic ammo is loud. Okay.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

You don't have any "proof" son.

You already embarrassed yourself by claiming that an AR is quieter than a .22 pistol, and I don't care if it's subsonic or not. So we know you don't have an AR or a .45.

What you believe based on your limited experience is not important. You like to plink with .22s, good for you.

It's time to go to bed now.