![Another reason faggots deserve the rope [1957x698 - 490KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/AZ9fmO.png){kind=link}
If there truly is no genetic aspect to it, and it happened because chemicals in the womb, why wouldnt the mother become gay?
If it was chemicals outside of the womb, why wouldnt his family be gay?
If it was the media, again, why wouldn't the rest of his family be gay?
Are all molestee's gay? I can attest that's not true.
So assuming it's not nature, rather chemicals, yet it doesn't affect everyone else who came in contact with it, wouldnt that mean it has something to do with that person on a genetic level?
I think sexual orientation could be formed early in life, and it can't really be controlled one way or the other. There might be a genetic predisposition, but I think identical twin studies prove that it's not entirely genetic.
I remember thinking the Statue of David and other such statues were hot when I was little, so it was probably already set in stone early on -- I just didn't fully understand it under I reached puberty.
lol yea the human body is a mystery. Nobody on this planet really knows what the hell is going on, so I say let everyone live their lives peacefully (not gonna happen)
(post is archived)