Roberts is dirty but Wood is NUTS.
I’ve been saying this for months. He’s clearly on drugs or is a paranoid schizophrenic. I love the people in the comments saying “he wouldn’t ask a question if he didn’t already have the answer!!!”
Really? Because he’s never given us any proof of any of the shit that he says. Not once. He says he has recordings and documents and all of this fucking shit and has been saying this about a number of different topics for a couple of months now and has produced zero evidence. Zero.
Only Qtards would believe a guy who never produces the things he says he has. Only a Q retard would act as if this guy shouldn’t be questioned.
If he has proof of the huge blockbuster claims he has made, why sit on it? Why not provide it? The people defending him by saying “he wouldn’t open up himself to a defamation lawsuit” are in another reality.
Roberts wouldn’t look twice at this guy if he was burning to death three feet away.
Why don't you people realize your tactics don't work anymore? I'm not upset, I'm just bored to the point of being annoyed. Calling people names and insulting them doesn't work anymore...please move on to a new thing. Thank you, says all of us.
Nice (((name)))
Yeah man, i gotta totally agree. I'm way past the 'politicking' and innuendo being played out in the media. It cowardly, it's obfuscation, it's lame. Shit that is this serious ( and the hundreds of other 'supposed' happenings ) just needs to be put out in the public view, cause none of its happening in any courts. If they say 'half these politicians are fcking pedos', well then drop the damn footage or wht ever on the dark web, send it to the news , who ever - give it to the russians to release for all i care, they say 'theyre taking bribes' drop the bank accounts - they got it all, don't they ??, enough of this 'muh optics' bs , if they truly want the public on their side, drop the whole lot. Show the surveillance , show the nsa data mining, fcking phone recordings, the cell phone pings, the credit card receipts, the used condoms, the dead bodies, the actual ritual abuse happening !! . They need to do what was done in belguim (dutroix affair) air the shit on prime time and say this is what these pos are doing, instead what do we actually get - thousands of supposed 'sealed indictments' (which really means it's administratively prevented from being able to be used, brought to trial/ acted upon) , how laughable ...
I'm not a lawyer, but I wonder if there's nothing or something in Woods' tweets that are basis for a defamation suit.
The audience doesn't generally know.
Just had a thought to the ridiculous 'narrative twisting' going on here. Curious of the context about scalia, Any half competent organisation esp scotus would have a discussion regarding replacement of existing members . Plus one could also say 'yes, Roberts is a member of a group that involves minors' and requires a fee - he was in an adoption process involving young children. Lawyers can spin anything into a ham sammich ...
(post is archived)