Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

There are quite a lot of accounts that do this. The problem being: this isn't a spoken conversation. Words aren't lost in the ether. They're sitting on a hard drive in @PMYB2's mom's house.

e: And the JIDF swung into this thread quickly to circle-jerk that I was being mean or antagonizing or some such retardation. Apparently calling someone out on their moving the goal posts is antagonizing.

There are quite a lot of accounts that do this. The problem being: this isn't a spoken conversation. Words aren't lost in the ether. They're sitting on a hard drive in @PMYB2's mom's house. e: And the JIDF swung into this thread quickly to circle-jerk that I was being mean or antagonizing or some such retardation. Apparently calling someone out on their moving the goal posts is antagonizing.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (237).
[–] • 0 pt

I did a quick google search and got kike media articles saying its tantamount to the no shirt no shoes no service policies. I couldn't find the federal law you referenced. Care to tell me what law so I can look it up by name? Im genuinely curious about that and less so about who is a kike and who isnt

[–] • 0 pt

jewgle search

That's disgusting.

It's in the ADA. I refuse to believe you're being honest here. It's been posted about CONSTANTLY since early summer. Some posts incorrectly claim HIPAA has any say in the matter, which it doesn't. But it's so regularly posted EVERYWHERE from kikebook to plebbit that I can not believe for a moment you're unaware.

[–] • 1 pt

Oh I thought you were referencing something that specifically addressed masks. The ADA makes sense, but the government is essentially telling these businesses to turn people away for not wearing a mask via illegal mandates. Why would the courts then punish businesses for following the illegal mandates?

The whole situation is completely fucked, but jewing some local business about the ADA while they're trying to appease tyrannical state and city officials doesnt seem productive. The family owned restaurant up the road from me doesnt want to make me wear a mask - they just want to fucking stay in business.

So to your central point about businesses requiring masks...I'd say we have to take that fight to governors and mayors. And we know how that's going...

[–] • 0 pt

Oh I thought you were referencing something that specifically addressed masks. The ADA makes sense...

The ADA does specifically address masks. I've dealt with this multiple times IRL. There are few who get it. Very few.

but the government is essentially telling these businesses to turn people away for not wearing a mask via illegal mandates.

No. Governors and unelected health officials are. The 'government' is not.

Why would the courts then punish businesses for following the illegal mandates?

Who do you think runs the jewdicial system?

The whole situation is completely fucked

Yes.

but jewing some local business about the ADA while they're trying to appease tyrannical state and city officials doesnt seem productive.

No. You can never appease a jew. You can never appease a communist. They're worse than children. They will forever want more.

SCOTUS on disregarding the Const due to "emergency" (i.ibb.co)

ZOGbots can't arrest you for assembly (i.ibb.co)

Judge ruling against overwhelming powergrabs by executive fiat (archive.md)

The family owned restaurant up the road from me doesnt want to make me wear a mask - they just want to fucking stay in business.

Which they can do and not expect a mask. As gyms country wide are finding out. Oddly it was barber-shops and hair salons who had the biggest balls and pushed back earliest.

I'd say we have to take that fight to governors and mayors. And we know how that's going...

It's not going.