WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

379

Genuinely curious; multiple front-page posts have glaring errors that anyone with a fifth-grade education should have seen.

It is difficult to understand someone's position when they don't take the time to explain it clearly. And if you don't want to take time to state your argument coherently, do you really expect the rest of us to take time sorting through your word vomit to try and see your point?

Or is it okay to speak like joggers here?

-=Edit=- Okay, got it. My question has been answered. Thank you.

Genuinely curious; multiple front-page posts have glaring errors that anyone with a fifth-grade education should have seen. It is difficult to understand someone's position when they don't take the time to explain it clearly. And if *you* don't want to take time to state your argument coherently, do you really expect the rest of us to take time sorting through your word vomit to try and see your point? Or is it okay to speak like joggers here? -=Edit=- Okay, got it. My question has been answered. Thank you.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

If you're too lazy to write properly, you'll be untrustworthy to those that read you.

[–] 2 pts

do you believe that writing well = trust worthy?

i find people trust what i say more when i type less formally, people are distrustful of intelligent people and making mistakes puts them at ease, i find that its only those who are very much bellow average that cling on to the stuff op pointed out, is primary school level shit, its not needed but some people will cling on to it because to them its an achievement where as iv learned the rule book, thought about the rules and then disregarded the unneeded rules

at the end of the day most of it is unneeded bullshit that now only exists so stupid can people feel smart when they notice someone not following the pointless rules that they hold in high regarded because that is their intellectual peak, just imagine a debate between a few great philosophers, do you think they are going to give a flying fuck about the punctuation used when trying to elucidate some abstract conceptualization relating to human nature, do you think they sat around the acropolis taking the piss out of the punctuation used? or do you think that they approached the issue like real philosophers and argue in good faith, having some intellectual honesty rather just looking for the easiest way to attack an argument