Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

265

Genuinely curious; multiple front-page posts have glaring errors that anyone with a fifth-grade education should have seen.

It is difficult to understand someone's position when they don't take the time to explain it clearly. And if you don't want to take time to state your argument coherently, do you really expect the rest of us to take time sorting through your word vomit to try and see your point?

Or is it okay to speak like joggers here?

-=Edit=- Okay, got it. My question has been answered. Thank you.

Genuinely curious; multiple front-page posts have glaring errors that anyone with a fifth-grade education should have seen. It is difficult to understand someone's position when they don't take the time to explain it clearly. And if *you* don't want to take time to state your argument coherently, do you really expect the rest of us to take time sorting through your word vomit to try and see your point? Or is it okay to speak like joggers here? -=Edit=- Okay, got it. My question has been answered. Thank you.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (123).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

You have a quote Suspicious Behavior quote designation semicolon I find that quote suspicious period quote

[–] • 0 pt

Except no one cares about your opinion

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

are you everyone? i know i certainly don't care about your opinion, but i don't make statements of logical fallacy.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

it i also a shame that you don't get humor.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

No one pays any regard to posters wearing the scarlet letter. In this case the chartreuse pink (in itself suspicious as a mandela effect as chartreuse is a hue of green/yellow) label of suspicious behavior.

[–] • 0 pt

Your reply indicates otherwise

You assume incorrectly I give a fuck what anyone does or does not think about me