WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

Genuinely curious; multiple front-page posts have glaring errors that anyone with a fifth-grade education should have seen.

It is difficult to understand someone's position when they don't take the time to explain it clearly. And if you don't want to take time to state your argument coherently, do you really expect the rest of us to take time sorting through your word vomit to try and see your point?

Or is it okay to speak like joggers here?

-=Edit=- Okay, got it. My question has been answered. Thank you.

Genuinely curious; multiple front-page posts have glaring errors that anyone with a fifth-grade education should have seen. It is difficult to understand someone's position when they don't take the time to explain it clearly. And if *you* don't want to take time to state your argument coherently, do you really expect the rest of us to take time sorting through your word vomit to try and see your point? Or is it okay to speak like joggers here? -=Edit=- Okay, got it. My question has been answered. Thank you.

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

I do like that you took the risky move of starting a sentence with "and", but actually reiterated the subject in the sentence, making it a proper sentence.

[–] 3 pts

That's a good position for a semicolon.

clearly. And if

could be reworked as

clearly; If

Or, just a standard comma, as op didn't say 'and' previously.

Either way op has worded that strangly.

[–] 0 pt

And this sentence could do with the first word. Nothing like correcting people's grammar with a grammatically incorrect rant.