Liberals use words to signal their tribe membership, not to exchange ideas.
In their eyes, you're just barking wrongly, and thus are an enemy.
There would be no dilemma.
Maybe but if others see that when the liberal is presented with that argument it brings to truth the blatant dilemma.
You're not convincing the liberal, you're convincing their peers. That's where they get their motivation to virtue signal from.
(post is archived)